Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36905293›Full record

ArticleInternational health2023

Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers in Cameroon and Nigeria: a web-based cross-sectional study.

Jerry Brown Aseneh, Valirie Ndip Agbor, Benjamin Momo Kadia, Elvis Anyaehiechukwu Okolie, Chinelo Janefrances Ofomata, Christie Linonge Etombi, Domin Sone M Ekaney, Yvonne Walburga Joko Fru

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jerry Brown AsenehDepartment of Health Research, Health Education and Research Organization (HERO), Buea, 154, Cameroon.
Valirie Ndip AgborDepartment of Health Research, Health Education and Research Organization (HERO), Buea, 154, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0002-6708-6852
Benjamin Momo KadiaDepartment of Health Research, Health Education and Research Organization (HERO), Buea, 154, Cameroon.
Elvis Anyaehiechukwu OkolieDepartment of Public Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BX, UK.
Chinelo Janefrances OfomataNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Christie Linonge EtombiDepartment of Health Research, Health Education and Research Organization (HERO), Buea, 154, Cameroon.
Domin Sone M EkaneyDepartment of Health Research, Health Education and Research Organization (HERO), Buea, 154, Cameroon.
Yvonne Walburga Joko FruCancer and Epidemiology Unit (CEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
University of Oxford · GBLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBTeesside University · GBUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigated the determinants of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Cameroon and Nigeria.

methodsThis analytic cross-sectional study was conducted from May to June 2021, including consenting HCWs aged ≥18 y identified using snowball sampling. Vaccine hesitancy was defined as indecisiveness or unwillingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Multilevel logistic regression yielded adjusted ORs (aORs) for vaccine hesitancy.

resultsWe included a total of 598 (about 60% women) participants. Little or no trust in the approved COVID-19 vaccines (aOR=2.28, 95% CI 1.24 to 4.20), lower perception of the importance of the vaccine on their personal health (5.26, 2.38 to 11.6), greater concerns about vaccine-related adverse effects (3.45, 1.83 to 6.47) and uncertainty about colleagues' acceptability of the vaccine (2.98, 1.62 to 5.48) were associated with higher odds of vaccine hesitancy. In addition, participants with chronic disease (aOR=0.34, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.97) and higher levels of concerns about getting COVID-19 (0.40, 0.18 to 0.87) were less likely to be hesitant to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

conclusionsCOVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among HCWs in this study was high and broadly determined by the perceived risk of COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines on personal health, mistrust in COVID-19 vaccines and uncertainty about colleagues' vaccine acceptability.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCameroonCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInternetMaleNigeriaVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesacceptabilityacceptanceCOVID-19health workershesitancysub-Saharan Africavaccine

Identifiers

PMID36905293
PMCPMC10629963
OpenAlexW4323921422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.