Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36905235›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2023

Nanostructured 3D-Printed Hybrid Scaffold Accelerates Bone Regeneration by Photointegrating Nanohydroxyapatite.

Lei Tong, Xiaocong Pu, Quanying Liu, Xing Li, Manyu Chen, Peilei Wang, Yaping Zou, Gonggong Lu, Jie Liang, Yujiang Fan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lei TongNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, 29# Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, 610064, China.
Xiaocong PuNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, 29# Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, 610064, China.
Quanying LiuNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, 29# Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, 610064, China.
Xing LiNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, 29# Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, 610064, China.
Manyu ChenNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, 29# Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, 610064, China.
Peilei WangNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, 29# Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, 610064, China.
Yaping ZouNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, 29# Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, 610064, China.
Gonggong LuDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Guoxue Lane, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jie LiangNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, 29# Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, 610064, China.
Yujiang FanNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, 29# Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, 610064, China.
Xingdong ZhangNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, 29# Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, 610064, China.
Yong SunNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, 29# Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, 610064, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2387-2616
Sichuan University · CNNational Medical Products Administration · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32071352National Natural Science Foundation of China 32271419Sichuan Provincial Key R&D Program of China 2020YFS0462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanostructured biomaterials that replicate natural bone architecture are expected to facilitate bone regeneration. Here, nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp) with vinyl surface modification is acquired by silicon-based coupling agent and photointegrated with methacrylic anhydride-modified gelatin to manufacture a chemically integrated 3D-printed hybrid bone scaffold (75.6 wt% solid content). This nanostructured procedure significantly increases its storage modulus by 19.43-fold (79.2 kPa) to construct a more stable mechanical structure. Furthermore, biofunctional hydrogel with biomimetic extracellular matrix is anchored onto the filament of 3D-printed hybrid scaffold (HGel-g-nHAp) by polyphenol-mediated multiple chemical reactions, which contributes to initiate early osteogenesis and angiogenesis by recruiting endogenous stem cells in situ. Significant ectopic mineral deposition is also observed in subcutaneously implanted nude mice with storage modulus enhancement of 25.3-fold after 30 days. Meanwhile, HGel-g-nHAp realizes substantial bone reconstruction in the rabbit cranial defect model, achieving 61.3% breaking load strength and 73.1% bone volume fractions in comparison to natural cranium 15 weeks after implantation. This optical integration strategy of vinyl modified nHAp provides a prospective structural design for regenerative 3D-printed bone scaffold.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsMiceMice, NudePrinting, Three-DimensionalProspective StudiesPyrenesRabbitsN-hydroxy-2-aminopyrenePyrenes3D printingbone regenerationhydrogelsnanohydroxyapatitephotoinitiation

Identifiers

PMID36905235
PMCPMC10161056
OpenAlexW4323920965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.