Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36905230›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2023

Postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolisation improves survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion: A multicenter retrospective cohort.

Laihui Luo, Renfeng Shan, Lifeng Cui, Zhao Wu, Junlin Qian, Shuju Tu, WenJian Zhang, Yuanpeng Xiong, Wei Lin, Hongtao Tang and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laihui LuoDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (The First Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University), Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.
Renfeng ShanDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (The First Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University), Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.
Lifeng CuiDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China.
Zhao WuDepartment of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University), Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.
Junlin QianDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan People's Hospital (Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University), Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province, China.
Shuju TuDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (The First Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University), Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.
WenJian ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University), Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.
Yuanpeng XiongDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (The First Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University), Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.
Wei LinDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan People's Hospital (Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University), Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province, China.
Hongtao TangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan People's Hospital (Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University), Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province, China.
Yang ZhangDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (The First Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University), Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.
Jisheng ZhuDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (The First Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University), Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.
Zeyu HuangDepartment of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University), Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.
Zhigang LiDepartment of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University), Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.
Shengping MaoDepartment of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University), Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.
Hui LiSchool of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Zemin HuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan People's Hospital (Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University), Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province, China.
Peng PengDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan People's Hospital (Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University), Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province, China.
Kun HeDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan People's Hospital (Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University), Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province, China.
Yong LiDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (The First Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University), Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9007-5705
Liping LiuDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7017-301X
Wei ShenDepartment of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University), Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1576-6159
Yongzhu HeDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (The First Clinical Medical College of Nanchang University), Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3894-3069
Nanchang University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNJinan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to investigate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolisation (PA-TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated by microvascular invasion (MVI).

methodsA retrospective analysis of 1505 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy at four medical centers, including 782 patients who received PA-TACE and 723 patients who did not receive adjuvant PA-TACE, has been conducted. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) was performed on the data to minimise selection bias, which resulted in a balanced clinical profile between groups.

resultsAfter PSM, 620 patients who received PA-TACE and 620 patients who did not receive PA-TACE were included. Disease-free survival (DFS, 1-, 2-, and 3-year: 88%-68%-61% vs. 70%-58%-51%, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS, 1-, 2-, and 3-year: 96%-89%-82% vs. 89%-77%-67%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients who received PA-TACE than in those who did not. Patients with MVI who received PA-TACE had significantly higher DFS (1-, 2-, and 3-year: 68%-57%-48% vs. 46%-31%-27%, p < 0.001) and OS (1-, 2-, and 3-year: 96%-84%-77% vs. 79%-58%-40%, p < 0.001) than those who did not receive PA-TACE. Among the six different liver cancer stages, MVI-negative patients did not have significant survival outcomes from PA-TACE (p > 0.05), whereas MVI-positive patients achieved higher DFS and OS from it (p < 0.05). Liver dysfunction, fever, and nausea/vomiting were the most common adverse events in patients receiving PA-TACE. There was no significant difference in grade 3 or 4 adverse events between the groups (p > 0.05).

conclusionsPostoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolisation has a good safety profile and may be a potentially beneficial treatment modality for survival outcomes in patients with HCC, especially those with concomitant MVI.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeadjuvantHCChepatectomyhepatocellular carcinomamicrovascular invasionpropensity scoresurvivalTACEtransarterial chemoembolisation

Identifiers

PMID36905230
PMCPMC10039794
OpenAlexW4323921253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.