Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36905033›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Testing and Evaluation of Wi-Fi RTT Ranging Technology for Personal Mobility Applications.

Manos Orfanos, Harris Perakis, Vassilis Gikas, Günther Retscher, Thanassis Mpimis, Ioanna Spyropoulou, Vasileia Papathanasopoulou

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manos OrfanosSchool of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece.
Harris PerakisSchool of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece.
Vassilis GikasSchool of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece.
Günther RetscherDepartment of Geodesy and Geoinformation, TU Wien-Vienna University of Technology, 1040 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6019-1548
Thanassis MpimisSchool of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece.
Ioanna SpyropoulouSchool of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece.
Vasileia PapathanasopoulouSchool of Rural, Surveying and Geoinformatics Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece.

Funding

European Regional Development Fundf Eastern Macedonia and Thrace MIS 5076606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid growth in the technological advancements of the smartphone industry has classified contemporary smartphones as a low-cost and high quality indoor positioning tools requiring no additional infrastructure or equipment. In recent years, the fine time measurement (FTM) protocol, achieved through the Wi-Fi round trip time (RTT) observable, available in the most recent models, has gained the interest of many research teams worldwide, especially those concerned with indoor localization problems. However, as the Wi-Fi RTT technology is still new, there is a limited number of studies addressing its potential and limitations relative to the positioning problem. This paper presents an investigation and performance evaluation of Wi-Fi RTT capability with a focus on range quality assessment. A set of experimental tests was carried out, considering 1D and 2D space, operating different smartphone devices at various operational settings and observation conditions. Furthermore, in order to address device-dependent and other type of biases in the raw ranges, alternative correction models were developed and tested. The obtained results indicate that Wi-Fi RTT is a promising technology capable of achieving a meter-level accuracy for ranges both in line-of-sight (LOS) and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) conditions, subject to suitable corrections identification and adaptation. From 1D ranging tests, an average mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.85 m and 1.24 m is achieved, for LOS and NLOS conditions, respectively, for 80% of the validation sample data. In 2D-space ranging tests, an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.1m is accomplished across the different devices. Furthermore, the analysis has shown that the selection of the bandwidth and the initiator-responder pair are crucial for the correction model selection, whilst knowledge of the type of operating environment (LOS and/or NLOS) can further contribute to Wi-Fi RTT range performance enhancement.

Indexed as

fine time measurement (FTM) protocolindoor positioningmultilaterationranging assessmentreceived signal strength (RSS)round trip time (RTT)signal-of-opportunity (SoP)wireless-fidelity (Wi-Fi)

Identifiers

PMID36905033
PMCPMC10007519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read8
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.