Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36904994›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Wave Equation Modeling via Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Models of Soft and Hard Constraints for Initial and Boundary Conditions.

Shaikhah Alkhadhr, Mohamed Almekkawy

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shaikhah AlkhadhrSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5938-2953
Mohamed AlmekkawySchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9222-3003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic ultrasound waves are the main instruments used in many noninvasive clinical procedures. They are continuously transforming medical treatments through mechanical and thermal effects. To allow for effective and safe delivery of ultrasound waves, numerical modeling methods such as the Finite Difference Method (FDM) and the Finite Element Method (FEM) are used. However, modeling the acoustic wave equation can result in several computational complications. In this work, we study the accuracy of using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to solve the wave equation when applying different combinations of initial and boundary conditions (ICs and BCs) constraints. By exploiting the mesh-free nature of PINNs and their prediction speed, we specifically model the wave equation with a continuous time-dependent point source function. Four main models are designed and studied to monitor the effects of soft or hard constraints on the prediction accuracy and performance. The predicted solutions in all the models were compared to an FDM solution for prediction error estimation. The trials of this work reveal that the wave equation modeled by a PINN with soft IC and BC (soft-soft) constraints reflects the lowest prediction error among the four combinations of constraints.

Indexed as

numerical modelingphysics-informed neural networksultrasound therapeuticswave equation

Identifiers

PMID36904994
PMCPMC10007620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.