ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Calibration Methods for Time-to-Digital Converters.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time-Domain ADC and Security Co-Design for SiP-Based Wireless SAW Sensor Readers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Unlocking stray light mysteries in the CoRot baffle with the time-of-flight method.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, two of the most common calibration methods of synchronous TDCs, which are the bin-by-bin calibration and the average-bin-width calibration, are first presented and compared. Then, an innovative new robust calibration method for asynchronous TDCs is proposed and evaluated. Simulation results showed that: (i) For a synchronous TDC, the bin-by-bin calibration, applied to a histogram, does not improve the TDC's differential non-linearity (DNL); nevertheless, it improves its Integral Non-Linearity (INL), whereas the average-bin-width calibration significantly improves both the DNL and the INL. (ii) For an asynchronous TDC, the DNL can be improved up to 10 times by applying the bin-by-bin calibration, whereas the proposed method is almost independent of the non-linearity of the TDC and can improve the DNL up to 100 times. The simulation results were confirmed by experiments carried out using real TDCs implemented on a Cyclone V SoC-FPGA. For an asynchronous TDC, the proposed calibration method is 10 times better than the bin-by-bin method in terms of the DNL improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.