Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36904971›Full record

Trial reportSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Taking a Load Off: User Perceptions of Smart Offloading Walkers for Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using the Technology Acceptance Model.

M G Finco, Gozde Cay, Myeounggon Lee, Jason Garcia, Elia Salazar, Tze-Woei Tan, David G Armstrong, Bijan Najafi

Open access · goldFull text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Diabetes Technology Meeting 2023.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The Why, What and Where Podcast on the Updated 2023 IWGDF Guideline on Offloading Treatments for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M G FincoInterdisciplinary Consortium for Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP), Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0637-2772
Gozde CayInterdisciplinary Consortium for Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP), Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1985-1772
Myeounggon LeeInterdisciplinary Consortium for Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP), Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8546-5613
Jason GarciaKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Elia SalazarKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7979-5015
Tze-Woei TanKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6658-9482
David G ArmstrongKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Bijan NajafiInterdisciplinary Consortium for Advanced Motion Performance (iCAMP), Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0320-8101
Baylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Improving the science of adherence reinforcement and safe mobility in people with diabetic foot ulcers using smart offloadingR01DK124789 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ARMSTRONG, DAVID GEORGE, NAJAFI, BIJAN · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK124789NIH HHS 1R01124789-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are commonly prescribed offloading walkers, but inadequate adherence to prescribed use can be a barrier to ulcer healing. This study examined user perspectives of offloading walkers to provide insight on ways to help promote adherence. Participants were randomized to wear: (1) irremovable, (2) removable, or (3) smart removable walkers (smart boot) that provided feedback on adherence and daily walking. Participants completed a 15-item questionnaire based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Spearman correlations assessed associations between TAM ratings with participant characteristics. Chi-squared tests compared TAM ratings between ethnicities, as well as 12-month retrospective fall status. A total of 21 adults with DFU (age 61.5 ± 11.8 years) participated. Smart boot users reported that learning how to use the boot was easy (ρ =-0.82,

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic FootAdultAgedHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesWalkingWound Healingadherencediabetic footdigital healthfoot carefoot ulcerremote patient monitoringsmart offloadingtelehealthwearable

Identifiers

PMID36904971
PMCPMC10006940
OpenAlexW4323045888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read4
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.