ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Inertia-Constrained Reinforcement Learning to Enhance Human Motor Control Modeling.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural correlates of fine motor grasping skills: Longitudinal insights into motor cortex activation using fNIRS.Brain and behavior · 2024Trial
- A PRISMA systematic review through time on predictive musculoskeletal simulations.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Locomotor impairment is a highly prevalent and significant source of disability and significantly impacts the quality of life of a large portion of the population. Despite decades of research on human locomotion, challenges remain in simulating human movement to study the features of musculoskeletal drivers and clinical conditions. Most recent efforts to utilize reinforcement learning (RL) techniques are promising in the simulation of human locomotion and reveal musculoskeletal drives. However, these simulations often fail to mimic natural human locomotion because most reinforcement strategies have yet to consider any reference data regarding human movement. To address these challenges, in this study, we designed a reward function based on the trajectory optimization rewards (TOR) and bio-inspired rewards, which includes the rewards obtained from reference motion data captured by a single Inertial Moment Unit (IMU) sensor. The sensor was equipped on the participants' pelvis to capture reference motion data. We also adapted the reward function by leveraging previous research on walking simulations for TOR. The experimental results showed that the simulated agents with the modified reward function performed better in mimicking the collected IMU data from participants, which means that the simulated human locomotion was more realistic. As a bio-inspired defined cost, IMU data enhanced the agent's capacity to converge during the training process. As a result, the models' convergence was faster than those developed without reference motion data. Consequently, human locomotion can be simulated more quickly and in a broader range of environments, with a better simulation performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.