Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36904823›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Facial Expression Recognition Robust to Occlusion and to Intra-Similarity Problem Using Relevant Subsampling.

Jieun Kim, Deokwoo Lee

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jieun KimDepartment of Computer Engineering, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea.
Deokwoo LeeDepartment of Computer Engineering, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0080-6886

Funding

Bisa Research Grant of Keimyung University 20220208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper proposes facial expression recognition (FER) with the wild data set. In particular, this paper chiefly deals with two issues, occlusion and intra-similarity problems. The attention mechanism enables one to use the most relevant areas of facial images for specific expressions, and the triplet loss function solves the intra-similarity problem that sometimes fails to aggregate the same expression from different faces and vice versa. The proposed approach for the FER is robust to occlusion, and it uses a spatial transformer network (STN) with an attention mechanism to utilize specific facial region that dominantly contributes (or that is the most relevant) to particular facial expressions, e.g., anger, contempt, disgust, fear, joy, sadness, and surprise. In addition, the STN model is connected to the triplet loss function to improve the recognition rate which outperforms the existing approaches that employ cross-entropy or other approaches using only deep neural networks or classical methods. The triplet loss module alleviates limitations of the intra-similarity problem, leading to further improvement of the classification. Experimental results are provided to substantiate the proposed approach for FER, and the result outperforms the recognition rate in more practical cases, e.g., occlusion. The quantitative result provides FER results with more than 2.09% higher accuracy compared to the existing FER results in CK+ data sets and 0.48% higher than the accuracy of the results with the modified ResNet model in the FER2013 data set.

Indexed as

EmotionsFacial RecognitionFaceFacial ExpressionFearRecognition, Psychologyattention mechanismfacial expression recognitionintra-similarity problemspatial transformation networktriplet loss function

Identifiers

PMID36904823
PMCPMC10007059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read12
table measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.