Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36904818›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Developing Prediction Models Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Quantify Cannabinoid Content in

Jonathan Tran, Simone Vassiliadis, Aaron C Elkins, Noel O I Cogan, Simone J Rochfort

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Determination of Optimal Harvest Time inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathan TranAgriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre, AgriBio, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.
Simone VassiliadisAgriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre, AgriBio, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.
Aaron C ElkinsAgriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre, AgriBio, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.
Noel O I CoganAgriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre, AgriBio, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1074-8998
Simone J RochfortAgriculture Victoria Research, AgriBio Centre, AgriBio, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8442-6081

Funding

Agriculture Victoria N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabis is commercially cultivated for both therapeutic and recreational purposes in a growing number of jurisdictions. The main cannabinoids of interest are cannabidiol (CBD) and delta-9 tetrahydrocannabidiol (THC), which have applications in different therapeutic treatments. The rapid, nondestructive determination of cannabinoid levels has been achieved using near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy coupled to high-quality compound reference data provided by liquid chromatography. However, most of the literature describes prediction models for the decarboxylated cannabinoids, e.g., THC and CBD, rather than naturally occurring analogues, tetrahydrocannabidiolic acid (THCA) and cannabidiolic acid (CBDA). The accurate prediction of these acidic cannabinoids has important implications for quality control for cultivators, manufacturers and regulatory bodies. Using high-quality liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (LCMS) data and NIR spectra data, we developed statistical models including principal component analysis (PCA) for data quality control, partial least squares regression (PLS-R) models to predict cannabinoid concentrations for 14 different cannabinoids and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) models to characterise cannabis samples into high-CBDA, high-THCA and even-ratio classes. This analysis employed two spectrometers, a scientific grade benchtop instrument (Bruker MPA II-Multi-Purpose FT-NIR Analyzer) and a handheld instrument (VIAVI MicroNIR Onsite-W). While the models from the benchtop instrument were generally more robust (99.4-100% accuracy prediction), the handheld device also performed well (83.1-100% accuracy prediction) with the added benefits of portability and speed. In addition, two cannabis inflorescence preparation methods were evaluated: finely ground and coarsely ground. The models generated from coarsely ground cannabis provided comparable predictions to that of the finely ground but represent significant timesaving in terms of sample preparation. This study demonstrates that a portable NIR handheld device paired with LCMS quantitative data can provide accurate cannabinoid predictions and potentially be of use for the rapid, high-throughput, nondestructive screening of cannabis material.

Indexed as

CannabidiolCannabinoidsCannabisSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredCannabidiolcannabidiolic acidCannabinoidscannabinoidspartial least square discriminant analysispartial least square regressionprincipal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID36904818
PMCPMC10007171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read16
measurements read20
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.