Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36904813›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Development and Analysis of a CNN- and Transfer-Learning-Based Classification Model for Automated Dairy Cow Feeding Behavior Recognition from Accelerometer Data.

Victor Bloch, Lilli Frondelius, Claudia Arcidiacono, Massimo Mancino, Matti Pastell

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nutrient Utilization, Requirements and Nutrigenomics in Sheep and Goats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Detecting Equine Gaits Through Rider-Worn Accelerometers.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Victor BlochNatural Resources Institute Luke (Finland), Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790 Helsinki, Finland.
Lilli FrondeliusNatural Resources Institute Luke (Finland), Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790 Helsinki, Finland.
Claudia ArcidiaconoDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment (Di3A), Building and Land Engineering Section, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 100, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4639-6229
Massimo MancinoDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment (Di3A), Building and Land Engineering Section, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 100, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Matti PastellNatural Resources Institute Luke (Finland), Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5810-4801

Funding

ICT-AGRI-2 ERA-NET CowBhave
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to technological developments, wearable sensors for monitoring the behavior of farm animals have become cheaper, have a longer lifespan and are more accessible for small farms and researchers. In addition, advancements in deep machine learning methods provide new opportunities for behavior recognition. However, the combination of the new electronics and algorithms are rarely used in PLF, and their possibilities and limitations are not well-studied. In this study, a CNN-based model for the feeding behavior classification of dairy cows was trained, and the training process was analyzed considering a training dataset and the use of transfer learning. Commercial acceleration measuring tags, which were connected by BLE, were fitted to cow collars in a research barn. Based on a dataset including 33.7 cow × days (21 cows recorded during 1-3 days) of labeled data and an additional free-access dataset with similar acceleration data, a classifier with F1 = 93.9% was developed. The optimal classification window size was 90 s. In addition, the influence of the training dataset size on the classifier accuracy was analyzed for different neural networks using the transfer learning technique. While the size of the training dataset was being increased, the rate of the accuracy improvement decreased. Beginning from a specific point, the use of additional training data can be impractical. A relatively high accuracy was achieved with few training data when the classifier was trained using randomly initialized model weights, and a higher accuracy was achieved when transfer learning was used. These findings can be used for the estimation of the necessary dataset size for training neural network classifiers intended for other environments and conditions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerAccelerometryAnimalsCattleFeeding BehaviorFemaleMachine Learningacceleration tagsCNN classifiercow behaviordataset variabilityopen-source datasettransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID36904813
PMCPMC10006954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read27
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.