Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36904752›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation of Machine Learning Based on Information Volume and Frequency Ratio: A Case Study of Weixin County, China.

Wancai He, Guoping Chen, Junsan Zhao, Yilin Lin, Bingui Qin, Wanlu Yao, Qing Cao

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wancai HeFaculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China.
Guoping ChenFaculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China.
Junsan ZhaoFaculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China.
Yilin LinFaculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China.
Bingui QinFaculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China.
Wanlu YaoFaculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China.
Qing CaoFaculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A landslide is one of the most destructive natural disasters in the world. The accurate modeling and prediction of landslide hazards have been used as some of the vital tools for landslide disaster prevention and control. The purpose of this study was to explore the application of coupling models in landslide susceptibility evaluation. This paper used Weixin County as the research object. First, according to the landslide catalog database constructed, there were 345 landslides in the study area. Twelve environmental factors were selected, including terrain (elevation, slope, slope direction, plane curvature, and profile curvature), geological structure (stratigraphic lithology and distance from fault zone), meteorological hydrology (average annual rainfall and distance to rivers), and land cover (NDVI, land use, and distance to roads). Then, a single model (logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest) and a coupled model (IV-LR, IV-SVM, IV-RF, FR-LR, FR-SVM, and FR-RF) based on information volume and frequency ratio were constructed, and the accuracy and reliability of the models were compared and analyzed. Finally, the influence of environmental factors on landslide susceptibility under the optimal model was discussed. The results showed that the prediction accuracy of the nine models ranged from 75.2% (LR model) to 94.9% (FR-RF model), and the coupling accuracy was generally higher than that of the single model. Therefore, the coupling model could improve the prediction accuracy of the model to a certain extent. The FR-RF coupling model had the highest accuracy. Under the optimal model FR-RF, distance from the road, NDVI, and land use were the three most important environmental factors, ac-counting for 20.15%, 13.37%, and 9.69%, respectively. Therefore, it was necessary for Weixin County to strengthen the monitoring of mountains near roads and areas with sparse vegetation to prevent landslides caused by human activities and rainfall.

Indexed as

frequency ratio (FR)information value (IV)landslide susceptibilitymachine learning modelWeixin County

Identifiers

PMID36904752
PMCPMC10007018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read56
table measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.