ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
TLS Protocol Analysis Using IoTST-An IoT Benchmark Based on Scheduler Traces.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) envisions billions of everyday objects sharing information. As new devices, applications and communication protocols are proposed for the IoT context, their evaluation, comparison, tuning and optimization become crucial and raise the need for a proper benchmark. While edge computing aims to provide network efficiency by distributed computing, this article moves towards sensor nodes in order to explore efficiency in the local processing performed by IoT devices. We present IoTST, a benchmark based on per-processor synchronized stack traces with the isolation and precise determination of the introduced overhead. It produces comparable detailed results and assists in determining the configuration that has the best processing operating point so that energy efficiency can also be considered. On benchmarking applications which involve network communication, the results can be influenced by the constant changes that occur in the state of the network. In order to circumvent such problems, different considerations or assumptions were used in the generalization experiments and the comparison to similar studies. To present IoTST usage on a real problem, we implemented it on a commercial off the-shelf (COTS) device and benchmarked a communication protocol, producing comparable results that are unaffected by the current network state. We evaluated different Transport-Layer Security (TLS) 1.3 handshake cipher suites at different frequencies and with various numbers of cores. Among other results, we could determine that the selection of a specific suite (Curve25519 and RSA) can improve the computation latency by up to four times over the worst suite candidate (P-256 and ECDSA), while both providing the same security level (128 bits).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.