Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36904595›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Virtual Sleep Lab-A Novel Method for Accurate Four-Class Sleep Staging Using Heart-Rate Variability from Low-Cost Wearables.

Pavlos Topalidis, Dominik P J Heib, Sebastian Baron, Esther-Sevil Eigl, Alexandra Hinterberger, Manuel Schabus

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pavlos TopalidisLaboratory for Sleep, Cognition and Consciousness Research, Department of Psychology and Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg (CCNS), Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6235-060X
Dominik P J HeibLaboratory for Sleep, Cognition and Consciousness Research, Department of Psychology and Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg (CCNS), Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7977-8557
Sebastian BaronDepartment of Mathematics, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2747-7728
Esther-Sevil EiglLaboratory for Sleep, Cognition and Consciousness Research, Department of Psychology and Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg (CCNS), Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-7632
Alexandra HinterbergerLaboratory for Sleep, Cognition and Consciousness Research, Department of Psychology and Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg (CCNS), Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5043-9909
Manuel SchabusLaboratory for Sleep, Cognition and Consciousness Research, Department of Psychology and Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg (CCNS), Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5899-8772

Funding

Imaging the Mind W 1233-BLand Salzburg 20102-F2002176-FPR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep staging based on polysomnography (PSG) performed by human experts is the de facto "gold standard" for the objective measurement of sleep. PSG and manual sleep staging is, however, personnel-intensive and time-consuming and it is thus impractical to monitor a person's sleep architecture over extended periods. Here, we present a novel, low-cost, automatized, deep learning alternative to PSG sleep staging that provides a reliable epoch-by-epoch four-class sleep staging approach (Wake, Light [N1 + N2], Deep, REM) based solely on inter-beat-interval (IBI) data. Having trained a multi-resolution convolutional neural network (MCNN) on the IBIs of 8898 full-night manually sleep-staged recordings, we tested the MCNN on sleep classification using the IBIs of two low-cost (<EUR 100) consumer wearables: an optical heart rate sensor (VS) and a breast belt (H10), both produced by POLAR®. The overall classification accuracy reached levels comparable to expert inter-rater reliability for both devices (VS: 81%, κ = 0.69; H10: 80.3%, κ = 0.69). In addition, we used the H10 and recorded daily ECG data from 49 participants with sleep complaints over the course of a digital CBT-I-based sleep training program implemented in the App NUKKUAA™. As proof of principle, we classified the IBIs extracted from H10 using the MCNN over the course of the training program and captured sleep-related changes. At the end of the program, participants reported significant improvements in subjective sleep quality and sleep onset latency. Similarly, objective sleep onset latency showed a trend toward improvement. Weekly sleep onset latency, wake time during sleep, and total sleep time also correlated significantly with the subjective reports. The combination of state-of-the-art machine learning with suitable wearables allows continuous and accurate monitoring of sleep in naturalistic settings with profound implications for answering basic and clinical research questions.

Indexed as

SleepWearable Electronic DevicesHeart RateHumansReproducibility of ResultsSleep Stagesautomatic sleep stagingdigital CBT-Iheart-rate variabilitymachine learningwearables

Identifiers

PMID36904595
PMCPMC10006886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read34
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.