ArticlePolymers2023
Bio-Based Adhesives Formulated from Tannic Acid, Chitosan, and Shellac for Packaging Materials.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- High strength tung oil-based adhesive with outstanding wet adhesion for cellulose fiber paper.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Adhesives and Sealants in Packaging: Advanced Materials, Performance, and Emerging Technologies (Part II).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Lignin-Based Adhesives for Various Packaging Applications.Polymers · 2026Review
- Paper and Cardboard Packaging: From Cellulosic Substrates to Functional and Hybrid Architectures.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Adhesives and Sealants in Packaging: Functional Roles and System-Level Classification (Part I).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development of antimicrobial paper from unbleached bamboo ASAM pulps reinforced with nanofibrillated cellulose and chitosan.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sustainable Adhesive Formulation and Performance Evaluation of Bacterial Nanocellulose and Aloe Vera for Packaging Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Effects of Shellac and Glycerol on the Physicochemical Properties of Chitosan Films.Polymers · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Re-Assemblable, Recyclable, and Self-Healing Epoxy Resin Adhesive Based on Dynamic Boronic Esters.Polymers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop bio-based adhesives that can be used for various packaging papers. In addition to commercial paper samples, papers produced from harmful plant species in Europe, such as Japanese Knotweed and Canadian Goldenrod, were used. In this research, methods were developed to produce bio-based adhesive solutions in combinations of tannic acid, chitosan, and shellac. The results showed that the viscosity and adhesive strength of the adhesives were best in solutions with added tannic acid and shellac. The tensile strength with adhesives of tannic acid and chitosan was 30% better than with commercial adhesives and 23% for combinations of shellac and chitosan. For paper from Japanese Knotweed and Canadian Goldenrod, the most durable adhesive was pure shellac. Because the surface morphology of the invasive plant papers was more open and had numerous pores compared to the commercial papers, the adhesives penetrated the paper structure and filled the voids. There was less adhesive on the surface and the commercial papers achieved better adhesive properties. As expected, the bio-based adhesives also showed an increase in peel strength and exhibited favorable thermal stability. In summary, these physical properties support the use of bio-based adhesives use in different packaging applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.