ArticlePolymers2023
Reinforcement Behavior of Chemically Unmodified Cellulose Nanofiber in Natural Rubber Nanocomposites.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance enhancement of wood composites using cellulose-reinforced cornstarch-tannin adhesives derived from electrical-assisted extraction.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Enhancing the performance of polyfarnesene-based bio-rubbers with surface-modified cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibers.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated the reinforcement behavior of small amounts of chemically unmodified cellulose nanofiber (CNF) in eco-friendly natural rubber (NR) nanocomposites. For this purpose, NR nanocomposites filled with 1, 3, and 5 parts per hundred rubber (phr) of cellulose nanofiber (CNF) were prepared by a latex mixing method. By using TEM, a tensile test, DMA, WAXD, a bound rubber test, and gel content measurements, the effect of CNF concentration on the structure-property relationship and reinforcing mechanism of the CNF/NR nanocomposite was revealed. Increasing the content of CNF resulted in decreased dispersibility of the nanofiber in the NR matrix. It was found that the stress upturn in the stress-strain curves was remarkably enhanced when the NR was combined with 1-3 phr CNF, and a noticeable increase in tensile strength (an approximately 122% increase in tensile strength over that of NR) was observed without sacrificing the flexibility of the NR in the NR filled with 1 phr CNF, though no acceleration in their strain-induced crystallization was observed. Since the NR chains were not inserted in the uniformly dispersed CNF bundles, the reinforcement behavior by the small content of CNF might be attributed to the shear stress transfer at the CNF/NR interface through the interfacial interaction (i.e., physical entanglement) between the nano-dispersed CNFs and the NR chains. However, at a higher CNF filling content (5 phr), the CNFs formed micron-sized aggregates in the NR matrix, which significantly induced the local stress concentration and promoted strain-induced crystallization, causing a substantially increased modulus but reduced the strain at the rupture of the NR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.