ArticlePolymers2023
Anti-Blast Performance of Polyurea-Coated Concrete Arch Structures.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of the durability of polyurea resin coatings against selected aggressive solutions in the sewage infrastructure environment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Experimental Investigations into the Deformation and Failure of Polyurea-Coated Steel Plates Experiencing Localized Air Blast Loads.Polymers · 2025Article
- Recent Developments in Polyurea Research for Enhanced Impact Penetration Resistance and Blast Mitigation.Polymers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the increasing number of violent terrorist attacks around the world, it is quite a common to improve the anti-blast performance of structures by reinforcing the exterior of the structure. In order to explore the dynamic performance of polyurea reinforced concrete arch structures, a three-dimensional finite element model was established by LS-DYNA software in this paper. Under the condition of ensuring the validity of the simulation model, the dynamic response of the arch structure under the blast load is investigated. Deflection and vibration of the structure under different reinforcement models are discussed. The optimum thickness of reinforcement (approximately 5 mm) and the strengthening method for the model were found by deformation analysis. The vibration analysis shows that the vibration damping effect of the sandwich arch structure is relatively excellent, but increasing the thickness and number of layers of the polyurea does not necessarily achieve a better vibration damping function for the structure. By reasonable design of the polyurea reinforcement layer and concrete arch structure, a protective structure with excellent performance of anti-blast and vibration damping can be created. Polyurea can be used as a new form of reinforcement in practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.