ReviewPolymers2023
Effects of the Curing Regime, Acid Exposure, Alkaline Activator Dosage, and Precursor Content on the Strength Development of Mortar with Alkali-Activated Slag and Fly Ash Binder: A Critical Review.
Review in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preparation of Unburned Lightweight Aggregates via Synergistic Utilization of Red Mud and Multi-Source Solid Wastes and Its Performance Investigation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effect of a Composite Activator on Comprehensive Performance of Alkali-Activated Foam Concrete.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Geopolymer Concretes with Organic Phase Change Materials-Analysis of Thermal Properties and Microstructure.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Characterization, mechanical strength, rheological properties and life cycle assessment of fully recycled concrete through geopolymer technology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fresh Properties, Strength, and Durability of Fiber-Reinforced Geopolymer and Conventional Concrete: A Review.Polymers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reductions of green gas emissions and the reuse/recycling of industrial byproducts are important for the mitigation of the environmental impact of the construction industry. The replacement of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is a concrete binder with industrial byproducts that possess sufficient cementitious and pozzolanic properties, such as ground granulated blast furnace slag (GBS) and fly ash. This critical review analyzes the effect of some of the most critical parameters on the development of the compressive strength of concrete or mortar that consists of combinations of alkali-activated GBS and fly ash as binders. The review includes the effects of the curing environment, the proportions of GBS and fly ash in the binder, and the concentration of the alkaline activator on strength development. The article also reviews the effect of exposure as well as the age of samples at the time of exposure to acidic media on the development of concrete strength. The effect of acidic media on mechanical properties was found to depend not only on the type of acid but also on the alkaline activator solution, proportions of GBS and fly ash in the binder, and the age of the sample at the time of exposure, among other factors. As a focused review, the article pinpoints important findings such as the change in compressive strength over time when mortar/concrete is cured in an environment that permits the loss of moisture versus curing in a system that retains the alkaline solution and keeps reactants available for hydration and the development of geopolymerization products. The relative contents of slag and fly ash in blended activators have a significant impact on strength development. Research methods used include a critical review of the literature, a comparison of reported research findings, and identifying reasons for agreement or disagreement of findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.