Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36904409›Full record

ReviewPolymers2023

Starch Nanoparticles: Preparation, Properties and Applications.

Herlina Marta, Dina Intan Rizki, Efri Mardawati, Mohamad Djali, Masita Mohammad, Yana Cahyana

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Herlina MartaDepartment of Food Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-4369-0016
Dina Intan RizkiDepartment of Food Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-4908-1721
Efri MardawatiResearch Collaboration Center for Biomass and Biorefinery between BRIN and Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-4981-434X
Mohamad DjaliDepartment of Food Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia.
Masita MohammadSolar Energy Research Institute (SERI), Universitas Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-5573-7048
Yana CahyanaDepartment of Food Technology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-8615-9498

Funding

Padjadjaran University 2203/UN6.3.1/PT.00/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Starch as a natural polymer is abundant and widely used in various industries around the world. In general, the preparation methods for starch nanoparticles (SNPs) can be classified into 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' methods. SNPs can be produced in smaller sizes and used to improve the functional properties of starch. Thus, they are considered for the various opportunities to improve the quality of product development with starch. This literature study presents information and reviews regarding SNPs, their general preparation methods, characteristics of the resulting SNPs and their applications, especially in food systems, such as Pickering emulsion, bioplastic filler, antimicrobial agent, fat replacer and encapsulating agent. The aspects related to the properties of SNPs and information on the extent of their utilisation are reviewed in this study. The findings can be utilised and encouraged by other researchers to develop and expand the applications of SNPs.

Indexed as

applicationspreparationpropertiesstarch nanoparticle

Identifiers

PMID36904409
PMCPMC10007494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read37
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.