ArticlePolymers2023
Comparison of Solidification Characteristics between Polymer-Cured and Bio-Cured Fly Ash in the Laboratory.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fly ash (FA) usually causes air and soil pollution due to wind erosion. However, most FA field surface stabilization technologies have long construction periods, poor curing effects, and secondary pollution. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop an efficient and environmentally friendly curing technology. Polyacrylamide (PAM) is an environmental macromolecular chemical material for soil improvement, and Enzyme Induced Carbonate Precipitation (EICP) is a new friendly bio-reinforced soil technology. This study attempted to use chemical, biological, and chemical-biological composite treatment solutions to solidify FA, and the curing effect was evaluated by testing indicators, such as unconfined compressive strength (UCS), wind erosion rate (WER), and agglomerate particle size. The results showed that due to the viscosity increase in the treatment solution, with the increase in PAM concentration, the UCS of the cured samples increased first (from 41.3 kPa to 376.1 kPa) and then decreased slightly (from 376.1 kPa to 367.3 kPa), while the wind erosion rate of the cured samples decreased first (from 39.567 mg/(m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.