ArticlePolymers2023
Cytoprotection of Probiotic
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Progress in Probiotic Encapsulation: Techniques, Characterization and Food Industry Prospects.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Linker-Engineered Tyrosine-Azide Coatings for Stable Strain-Promoted Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition (SPAAC) Functionalization.Polymers · 2025Article
- Nanoencapsulation of Biotics: Feasibility to Enhance Stability and Delivery for Improved Gut Health.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Cyborg microbe biohybrids with metal-organic coating layers: Strategies, functionalisation and potential applications.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Action and immunomodulatory mechanisms, formulations, and safety concerns of probiotics.Bioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2025Review
- Application of Encapsulation Strategies for Probiotics: From Individual Loading to Co-Encapsulation.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Cytoprotection of ProbioticPolymers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One-step fabrication method for thin films and shells is developed with nature-derived eggshell membrane hydrolysates (ESMHs) and coffee melanoidins (CMs) that have been discarded as food waste. The nature-derived polymeric materials, ESMHs and CMs, prove highly biocompatible with living cells, and the one-step method enables cytocompatible construction of cell-in-shell nanobiohybrid structures. Nanometric ESMH-CM shells are formed on individual probiotic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.