Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36904087›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Parent Perception of School Meals in the San Joaquin Valley during COVID-19: A Photovoice Project.

Tatum M Sohlberg, Emma C Higuchi, Valeria M Ordonez, Gabriela V Escobar, Ashley De La Rosa, Genoveva Islas, Cecilia Castro, Kenneth Hecht, Christina E Hecht, Janine S Bruce and 1 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tatum M SohlbergDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3145 Porter Drive, Office F110, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
Emma C HiguchiDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3145 Porter Drive, Office F110, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
Valeria M OrdonezDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3145 Porter Drive, Office F110, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1321-1494
Gabriela V EscobarDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3145 Porter Drive, Office F110, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
Ashley De La RosaDolores Huerta Foundation, Bakersfield, CA 93303, USA.
Genoveva IslasCultiva La Salud, Fresno, CA 93703, USA.
Cecilia CastroDolores Huerta Foundation, Bakersfield, CA 93303, USA.
Kenneth HechtNutrition Policy Institute, Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, 1111 Franklin Street, 5th Floor, Oakland, CA 94607, USA.
Christina E HechtNutrition Policy Institute, Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, 1111 Franklin Street, 5th Floor, Oakland, CA 94607, USA.
Janine S BruceDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3145 Porter Drive, Office F110, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
Anisha I PatelDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 3145 Porter Drive, Office F110, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

School-based nutrition programs are crucial to reducing food insecurity. The COVID-19 pandemic adversely impacted students' school meal participation. This study seeks to understand parent views of school meals during COVID-19 to inform efforts to improve participation in school meal programs. Photovoice methodology was used to explore parental perception of school meals in San Joaquin Valley, California, a region of predominately Latino farmworker communities. Parents in seven school districts photographed school meals for a one-week period during the pandemic and then participated in focus group discussions and small group interviews. Focus group discussions and small group interviews were transcribed, and data were analyzed using a team-based, theme-analysis approach. Three primary domains emerged: benefits of school meal distribution, meal quality and appeal, and perceived healthfulness. Parents perceived school meals as beneficial to addressing food insecurity. However, they noted that meals were unappealing, high in added sugar, and unhealthy, which led to discarded meals and decreased participation in the school meal program. The transition to grab-and-go style meals was an effective strategy for providing food to families during pandemic school closures, and school meals remain an important resource for families experiencing food insecurity. However, negative parental perceptions of the appeal and nutritional content of school meals may have decreased school meal participation and increased food waste that could persist beyond the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Food ServicesRefuse DisposalHumansMealsPandemicsParentsPerceptionfood insecurityphotovoiceschool meals

Identifiers

PMID36904087
PMCPMC10005543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read16
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.