Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36903955›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Comparison between Inbred and Hybrid Maize Haploid Inducers.

Henrique Uliana Trentin, Recep Yavuz, Abil Dermail, Ursula Karoline Frei, Somak Dutta, Thomas Lübberstedt

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. In vitro- and in vivo-based approaches for doubled haploid production in Zea mays L.: challenges and opportunities.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Henrique Uliana TrentinBayer Crop Science, Coxilha 99145-000, RS, Brazil.
Recep YavuzDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-6365-5078
Abil DermailDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9838-1897
Ursula Karoline FreiDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5969-7306
Somak DuttaDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5613-8987
Thomas LübberstedtDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0526-0798

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture IOW03717, IOW04714, IOW05520; IOW05510; IOW05656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of haploid induction systems is regarded not only for high haploid induction rate (HIR) but also resource savings. Isolation fields are proposed for hybrid induction. However, efficient haploid production depends on inducer traits such as high HIR, abundant pollen production, and tall plants. Seven hybrid inducers and their respective parents were evaluated over three years for HIR, seeds set in cross-pollinations, plant and ear height, tassel size, and tassel branching. Mid-parent heterosis was estimated to quantify how much inducer traits improve in hybrids in comparison to their parents. Heterosis benefits hybrid inducers for plant height, ear height, and tassel size. Two hybrid inducers, BH201/LH82-Ped126 and BH201/LH82-Ped128, are promising for haploid induction in isolation fields. Hybrid inducers offer convenience and resource-effectiveness for haploid induction by means of improving plant vigor without compromising HIR.

Indexed as

agronomic performancehaploid induction rateheterosishybrid inducerseed setZea mays L.

Identifiers

PMID36903955
PMCPMC10005713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read75
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.