Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36903921›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Moving Away from 12:12; the Effect of Different Photoperiods on Biomass Yield and Cannabinoids in Medicinal Cannabis.

Tyson James Peterswald, Jos Cornelis Mieog, Razlin Azman Halimi, Nelson Joel Magner, Amy Trebilco, Tobias Kretzschmar, Sarah Jane Purdy

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Research Progress on Flowering Period of Hemp.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. IlluminatingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Comparative genomics of flowering behavior inFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tyson James PeterswaldNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries, 105 Prince Street, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
Jos Cornelis MieogSouthern Cross Plant Science, Southern Cross University, Military Rd., East Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.
Razlin Azman HalimiSouthern Cross Plant Science, Southern Cross University, Military Rd., East Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3962-0736
Nelson Joel MagnerNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries, 105 Prince Street, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
Amy TrebilcoNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries, 105 Prince Street, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
Tobias KretzschmarSouthern Cross Plant Science, Southern Cross University, Military Rd., East Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.
Sarah Jane PurdyNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries, 105 Prince Street, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.

Funding

This project received grant funding from the Australian Government via the Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Re-sources, as part of the Cooperative Research Centres Project (CRC-P) program-Round 7-Growing the medicinal Cannabis in-dustry-precisi Cooperative Research Centres Project (CRC-P) program-Round 7-Growing the medicinal Cannabis industry-precision farming to pharmaceuticals
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The standard practice to initiate flowering in medicinal cannabis involves reducing the photoperiod from a long-day period to an equal duration cycle of 12 h light (12L)/12 h dark (12D). This method reflects the short-day flowering dependence of many cannabis varieties but may not be optimal for all. We sought to identify the effect of nine different flowering photoperiod treatments on the biomass yield and cannabinoid concentration of three medicinal cannabis varieties. The first, "Cannatonic", was a high cannabidiol (CBD)-accumulating line, whereas the other two, "Northern Lights" and "Hindu Kush", were high Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) accumulators. The nine treatments tested, following 18 days under 18 h light/6 h dark following cloning and propagation included a standard 12L:12D period, a shortened period of 10L:14D, and a lengthened period of 14L:10D. The other six treatments started in one of the aforementioned and then 28 days later (mid-way through flowering) were switched to one of the other treatments, thus causing either an increase of 2 or 4 h, or a decrease of 2 or 4 h. Measured parameters included the timing of reproductive development; the dry weight flower yield; and the % dry weight of the main target cannabinoids, CBD and THC, from which the total g cannabinoid per plant was calculated. Flower biomass yields were highest for all lines when treatments started with 14L:10D; however, in the two THC lines, a static 14L:10D photoperiod caused a significant decline in THC concentration. Conversely, in Cannatonic, all treatments starting with 14L:10D led to a significant increase in the CBD concentration, which led to a 50-100% increase in total CBD yield. The results show that the assumption that a 12L:12D photoperiod is optimal for all lines is incorrect as, in some lines, yields can be greatly increased by a lengthened light period during flowering.

Indexed as

cannabinoidsfloweringmedicinal cannabisphotoperiod

Identifiers

PMID36903921
PMCPMC10004775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read40
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.