Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36903889›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Community-Level Incentive Mechanisms for the Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives: A Malawi Case Study.

Adam G Drucker, Nolipher Khaki Mponya, Francesca Grazioli, Nigel Maxted, Joana Magos Brehm, Ehsan Dulloo

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. FosteringFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adam G DruckerBioversity International, Via di San Domenico 1, 00153 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9800-6800
Nolipher Khaki MponyaMalawi Plant Genetic Resources Centre (MPGRC), Chitedze Research Station, Lilongwe P.O. Box 158, Malawi.
Francesca GrazioliBioversity International, Via di San Domenico 1, 00153 Rome, Italy.
Nigel MaxtedSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Joana Magos BrehmSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6444-6488
Ehsan DullooBioversity International, Via di San Domenico 1, 00153 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5567-8220

Funding

Darwin Initiative 26-023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being an increasingly important source of genes for crop breeding aimed at improving food security and climate change adaptation, crop wild relatives (CWRs) are globally threatened. A root cause of CWR conservation challenges is a lack of institutions and payment mechanisms by which the beneficiaries of CWR conservation services (such as breeders) could compensate those who can supply them. Given that CWR conservation generates important public good values, for the significant proportion of CWRs found outside of protected areas, there is a strong justification for the design of incentive mechanisms to support landowners whose management practices positively contribute to CWR conservation. This paper contributes to facilitating an improved understanding of the costs of in situ CWR conservation incentive mechanisms, based on a case study application of payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services across 13 community groups in three districts in Malawi. Results demonstrate a high willingness to participate in conservation activities, with average conservation tender bids per community group being a modest MWK 20,000 (USD 25) p.a. and covering 22 species of CWRs across 17 related crops. As such, there appears to be significant potential for community engagement in CWR conservation activities that is complementary to that required in protected areas and can be achieved at modest cost where appropriate incentive mechanisms can be implemented.

Indexed as

community engagementconservation incentivescrop wild relativesecosystem servicespayments for agrobiodiversity conservation services

Identifiers

PMID36903889
PMCPMC10005345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read2
measurements read35
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.