Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36903473›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Analytical Method Cluster Development for Comprehensive Characterisation of Suberinic Acids Derived from Birch Outer Bark.

Daniela Godina, Raimonds Makars, Aigars Paze, Janis Rizhikovs

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniela GodinaBiorefinery Laboratory, Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry, LV-1006 Riga, Latvia.
Raimonds MakarsBiorefinery Laboratory, Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry, LV-1006 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-8073-624X
Aigars PazeBiorefinery Laboratory, Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry, LV-1006 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0003-3209-5289
Janis RizhikovsBiorefinery Laboratory, Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry, LV-1006 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-4825-3053

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suberin is a complex polyester biopolymer, and it is practically impossible to estimate the real content of suberin in suberised plant tissues. This indicates the importance of the development of instrumental analytical methods for the comprehensive characterisation of suberin derived from plant biomass for the successful integration of suberinic products into biorefinery production chains. In this study, we optimised two GC-MS methods-one with direct sylilation, and the second with additional depolymerisation, using GPC methods with RI detector and polystyrene calibration and with a three-angle light scattering detector and an eighteen-angle light scattering detector. We also performed MALDI-Tof analysis for non-degraded suberin structure determination. We characterised suberinic acid (SA) samples obtained from birch outer bark after alkaline depolymerisation. The samples were particularly rich in diols, fatty acids and their esters, hydroxyacids and their corresponding esters, diacids and their corresponding esters, as well as extracts (mainly betulin and lupeol) and carbohydrates. To remove phenolic-type admixtures, treatment with ferric chloride (FeCl

Indexed as

BetulaPlant BarkChloridesFatty AcidsFerric CompoundsGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHydroxy AcidsPlantsChloridesFatty Acidsferric chlorideFerric CompoundsHydroxy Acidsbiomassbiorefinerybirch barkdepolymerisationsuberinsuberinic acids

Identifiers

PMID36903473
PMCPMC10005158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read92
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.