Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36903262›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Differentiation of Mountain- and Garden-Cultivated Ginseng with Different Growth Years Using HS-SPME-GC-MS Coupled with Chemometrics.

Luoqi Zhang, Ping Wang, Sen Li, Dan Wu, Yute Zhong, Weijie Li, Haiyu Xu, Luqi Huang

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Transcriptome Analysis of WildPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luoqi ZhangCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China.
Ping WangInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Sen LiExperimental Research Center, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Dan WuInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Yute ZhongCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China.
Weijie LiInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Haiyu XuInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Luqi HuangNational Resource Center for Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central public Welfare Research Institutes ZXKT17058Fundamental Research Funds for the Central public Welfare Research Institutes ZZ13-YQ-095Intergovernmental Cooperation in International Science and Technology Innovation 2022YFE0119300Scientific and technological innovation project of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences CI2021A04904Scientific and technological innovation project of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences CI2021A04907Scientific and technological innovation project of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences CI2021B015Scientific and technological the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81830111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there are differences in the appearance of Mountain-Cultivated Ginseng (MCG) and Garden-Cultivated Ginseng (GCG), it is very difficult to distinguish them when the samples are processed to slices or powder. Moreover, there is significant price difference between them, which leads to the widespread adulteration or falsification in the market. Thus, the authentication of MCG and GCG is crucial for the effectiveness, safety, and quality stability of ginseng. In the present study, a headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) coupled with chemometrics approach was developed to characterize the volatile component profiles in MCG and GCG with 5-,10-,15-growth years, and subsequently to discover differentiating chemical markers. As a result, we characterized, for the first time, 46 volatile components from all the samples by using the NIST database and the Wiley library. The base peak intensity chromatograms were subjected to multivariate statistical analysis to comprehensively compare the chemical differences among the above samples. MCG

Indexed as

PanaxVolatile Organic CompoundsChemometricsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidGardensGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometrySolid Phase MicroextractionVolatile Organic CompoundsGarden-Cultivated GinsengHS-SPME-GC-MSMountain-Cultivated GinsengOPLS-DAPCA

Identifiers

PMID36903262
PMCPMC10004156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read21
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.