Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36902869›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Antiplatelet Strategies for Older Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: Finding Directions in a Low-Evidence Field.

Stefano De Servi, Antonio Landi, Stefano Savonitto, Nuccia Morici, Leonardo De Luca, Claudio Montalto, Gabriele Crimi, Roberta De Rosa, Giuseppe De Luca

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Treatment of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the elderly: the SENIOR-RITA trial.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefano De ServiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia Medical School, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Antonio LandiDivision of Cardiology, Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.
Stefano SavonittoClinica San Martino, 23864 Malgrate, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1216-0784
Nuccia MoriciIRCCS S. Maria Nascente-Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, 20148 Milan, Italy.
Leonardo De LucaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, A.O. San Camillo-Forlanini, 00152 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8552-1272
Claudio MontaltoInterventional Cardiology, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy.
Gabriele CrimiInterventional Cardiology Unit, Cardio-Thoraco Vascular Department (DICATOV), IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2852-061X
Roberta De RosaUniversity Hospital San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, 84131 Salerno, Italy.
Giuseppe De LucaDivision of Cardiology, AOU "Policlinico G. Martino", Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98039 Messina, Italy.
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITDon Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITEnte Ospedaliero Cantonale · CHGoethe University Frankfurt · DEOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients ≥ 75 years of age account for about one third of hospitalizations for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Since the latest European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend that older ACS patients use the same diagnostic and interventional strategies used by the younger ones, most elderly patients are currently treated invasively. Therefore, an appropriate dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is indicated as part of the secondary prevention strategy to be implemented in such patients. The choice of the composition and duration of DAPT should be tailored on an individual basis, after careful assessment of the thrombotic and bleeding risk of each patient. Advanced age is a main risk factor for bleeding. Recent data show that in patients of high bleeding risk short DAPT (1 to 3 months) is associated with decreased bleeding complications and similar thrombotic events, as compared to standard 12-month DAPT. Clopidogrel seems the preferable P2Y12 inhibitor, due to a better safety profile than ticagrelor. When the bleeding risk is associated with a high thrombotic risk (a circumstance present in about two thirds of older ACS patients) it is important to tailor the treatment by taking into account the fact that the thrombotic risk is high during the first months after the index event and then wanes gradually over time, whereas the bleeding risk remains constant. Under these circumstances, a de-escalation strategy seems reasonable, starting with DAPT that includes aspirin and low-dose prasugrel (a more potent and reliable P2Y12 inhibitor than clopidogrel) then switching after 2-3 months to DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel for up to 12 months.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromeanti-platelet therapyantithrombotic therapyelderly patientshigh bleeding riskpercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID36902869
PMCPMC10003933
OpenAlexW4323362177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read55
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.