Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36902868›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation-A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Christian Schoepp, Tobias Ohmann, Wolfgang Martin, Arthur Praetorius, Christine Seelmann, Marcel Dudda, Dirk Stengel, Jakob Hax

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christian SchoeppDepartment of Arthroscopic Surgery, Sports Traumatology and Sports Medicine, BG Klinikum Duisburg gGmbH, Großenbaumer Allee 250, 47249 Duisburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1902-9164
Tobias OhmannResearch Department, BG Klinikum Duisburg gGmbH, Großenbaumer Allee 250, 47249 Duisburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1762-2765
Wolfgang MartinDepartment of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinikum Duisburg gGmbH, Großenbaumer Allee 250, 47249 Duisburg, Germany.
Arthur PraetoriusAthletikum Rhein Ruhr, BG Klinikum Duisburg gGmbH, Großenbaumer Allee 250, 47249 Duisburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3347-323X
Christine SeelmannResearch Department, BG Klinikum Duisburg gGmbH, Großenbaumer Allee 250, 47249 Duisburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4242-6646
Marcel DuddaDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Dirk StengelBG Kliniken-Klinikverbund der Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung gGmbH, Leipziger Pl. 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Jakob HaxDepartment of Knee and Hip Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7641-052X

Funding

German Statutory Accident Insurance (Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung, DGUV project reference identifier FF-FR 0251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe postoperative use of a rehabilitative knee brace after isolated primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft is controversial. A knee brace may provide subjective safety but can cause damage if applied incorrectly. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a knee brace on clinical outcomes following isolated ACLR using HT autograft.

methodsIn this prospective randomised trial, 114 adults (32.4 ± 11.5 years, 35.1% women) underwent isolated ACLR using HT autograft after primary ACL rupture. Patients were randomly assigned to wear either a knee brace (

resultsThere were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in IKDC scores between the two study groups (3.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.39 to 7.97,

conclusionsBrace-free rehabilitation is non-inferior to a brace-based protocol regarding physical recovery 1 year after isolated ACLR using HT autograft. Consequently, the use of a knee brace might be avoided after such a procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Indexed as

ACLbrace-freebracinghamstring tendonkneerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36902868
PMCPMC10004240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read16
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.