ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Impact of Acrylic and Silicone-Based Soft-Liner Materials on Biting Force and Quality of Life of the Complete Denture Wearers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Evaluation of Reference Bite Force Values: Investigating the Relationship Between Dental Prosthetic Restoration and Bite Force in a Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Effects of incorporating magnesium oxide and zirconium dioxide nanoparticles in acrylic resin denture base material: a comparative study.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of Soft Liners on Bite Force in Complete Denture Wearers: A Prospective Cohort Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Single versus two dental implants retained mandibular over dentures: comparison of function, patient satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life and success of treatment.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of autopolymerized, heat-polymerized, milled, and 3D printed denture base materials bonded to 4 different denture liners: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Evaluation of open-face maxillary complete denture for patients with prominent premaxilla: a crossover study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- The Effect of Exposure to Candida Albicans Suspension on the Properties of Silicone Dental Soft Lining Material.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This rerandomized clinical trial evaluated the influence of soft liners (SL) on biting force, pain perception, and the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of complete denture wearers. Twenty-eight completely edentulous patients complaining of ill-fitting lower complete dentures were selected to participate in the study from the Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Taibah University. All patients received new complete maxillary and mandibular dentures; then they were randomly divided into two groups (14 patients in each group): the acrylic-based SL group, in which the mandibular denture was lined with an acrylic-based soft liner, and the silicone-based SL group, in which the mandibular denture was lined with a silicone-based soft liner. OHRQoL and maximum bite force (MBF) were assessed in this study before denture relining (baseline), then at one month and three months after relining. The finding showed that both treatment modalities significantly improved the OHRQoL of included patients at one-month and three-month periods compared to baseline records (i.e., dentures before relining) with a statistically significant difference (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.