ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies on the Effectiveness and Safety of Ustekinumab among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Eastern and Western Countries.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Effectiveness and Persistence of Ustekinumab in Crohn's Disease Patients: An Observational Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Baseline Fusobacterium Abundance Predicts Ustekinumab Response in Crohn's Disease: A Prospective Microbiome Cohort Study.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- [Old and New Biologics and Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Anti-interleukins].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2024Review
- How underappreciated autoinflammatory (innate immunity) mechanisms dominate disparate autoimmune disorders.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Research progress of Ustekinumab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Opportunistic infections changed before and after SARS-CoV-2 infection in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a retrospective single-center study in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- A Narrative Review of Cytokine Networks: Pathophysiological and Therapeutic Implications for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Pathogenesis.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Intravenous ustekinumab maintenance treatment in patients with loss of response to subcutaneous dosing.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUstekinumab (UST) is an IL12/23 inhibitor utilized for altering inflammatory responses in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Clinical trials and case reports suggested that the effectiveness and safety of UST may differ among IBD patients in Eastern and Western countries. However, related data have not been systematically reviewed and analyzed.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and effectiveness of UST in IBD included relevant literature from the Medline and Embase databases. The main outcomes were clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, and adverse events in IBD.
resultsWe analyzed 49 real-world studies, most of which included patients with biological failure (89.1% CD and 97.1% UC). In UC patients, clinical remission rates were 34% at 12 weeks, 40% at 24 weeks, and 37% at 1 year. In CD patients, clinical remission rates were 46% at 12 weeks, 51% at 24 weeks, and 47% at 1 year. Clinical remission rates of CD patients were 40% at 12 weeks and 44% at 24 weeks in Western countries, versus 63% and 72% in Eastern countries, respectively.
conclusionUST is an effective drug for IBD with a promising safety profile. Although no RCTs have been performed in Eastern countries, the effectiveness of UST on CD patients is not inferior to that in Western countries based on the existing data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.