Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36902681›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies on the Effectiveness and Safety of Ustekinumab among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Eastern and Western Countries.

He Zhou, Fang Wang, Jian Wan, Song Su, Yanting Shi, Xiaofei Li, Tong Wu, Jie Liang

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Old and New Biologics and Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Anti-interleukins].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

He ZhouState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.
Fang WangState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.ORCID 0009-0003-2344-2151
Jian WanState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9941-0576
Song SuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Yanting ShiState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.
Xiaofei LiState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.
Tong WuState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6829-6950
Jie LiangState Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.

Funding

Independent Funds of the Key Laboratory CBSKL2015Z12Independent Funds of the Key Laboratory CBSKL2022ZZ34National Natural Science Foundation of China Major Research Program Integration Project 92259302Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province, Key Industrial Innovation Project Fund 2023-ZDLSF-44
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUstekinumab (UST) is an IL12/23 inhibitor utilized for altering inflammatory responses in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Clinical trials and case reports suggested that the effectiveness and safety of UST may differ among IBD patients in Eastern and Western countries. However, related data have not been systematically reviewed and analyzed.

methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and effectiveness of UST in IBD included relevant literature from the Medline and Embase databases. The main outcomes were clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, and adverse events in IBD.

resultsWe analyzed 49 real-world studies, most of which included patients with biological failure (89.1% CD and 97.1% UC). In UC patients, clinical remission rates were 34% at 12 weeks, 40% at 24 weeks, and 37% at 1 year. In CD patients, clinical remission rates were 46% at 12 weeks, 51% at 24 weeks, and 47% at 1 year. Clinical remission rates of CD patients were 40% at 12 weeks and 44% at 24 weeks in Western countries, versus 63% and 72% in Eastern countries, respectively.

conclusionUST is an effective drug for IBD with a promising safety profile. Although no RCTs have been performed in Eastern countries, the effectiveness of UST on CD patients is not inferior to that in Western countries based on the existing data.

Indexed as

effectivenessinflammatory bowel diseasemeta-analysisustekinumab

Identifiers

PMID36902681
PMCPMC10004158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read189
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.