Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36902534›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Perioperative Drug Treatment in Pancreatic Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ingmar F Rompen, Daniela C Merz, Karam T Alhalabi, Rosa Klotz, Eva Kalkum, Thomas M Pausch, Hendrik Strothmann, Pascal Probst

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ingmar F RompenDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniela C MerzDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7977-0275
Karam T AlhalabiDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Rosa KlotzDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Eva KalkumStudy Center of the German Society of Surgery, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas M PauschDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6145-3263
Hendrik StrothmannDepartment of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Thurgau, 8596 Münsterlingen, Switzerland.
Pascal ProbstDepartment of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Thurgau, 8596 Münsterlingen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0895-4015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPancreatic resections for malignant or benign diseases are associated with major morbidity and changes in physiology. To reduce perioperative complications and enhance recovery, many types of perioperative medical management have been introduced. The aim of this study was to provide an evidence-based overview on the best perioperative drug treatment.

methodsThe electronic bibliographic databases Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating perioperative drug treatments in pancreatic surgery. The investigated drugs were somatostatin analogues, steroids, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT), prokinetic therapy, antidiabetic drugs, and proton pump inhibitors (PPI). Targeted outcomes in each drug category were meta-analyzed.

resultsA total of 49 RCT were included. The analysis of somatostatin analogues showed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in the somatostatin group compared to the control group (OR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.74). The comparison of glucocorticoids versus placebo showed significantly less POPF in the glucocorticoid group (OR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.77). There was no significant difference in DGE when erythromycin was compared to placebo (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.08 to 1.30). The other investigated drug regimens could only be analyzed qualitatively.

conclusionThis systematic review provides a comprehensive overview on perioperative drug treatment in pancreatic surgery. Some often-prescribed perioperative drug treatments lack high quality evidence and further research is needed.

Indexed as

glucocorticoidinsulinpancreaspancreatic enzyme replacementproton pump inhibitorssomatostatinsurgery

Identifiers

PMID36902534
PMCPMC10003556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read97
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.