Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36902400›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Recent Advances in Tick Antigen Discovery and Anti-Tick Vaccine Development.

Muhammad Nadeem Abbas, Mohamed Amine Jmel, Imen Mekki, Ingrid Dijkgraaf, Michail Kotsyfakis

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Immunization with mRNA-LNPs EncodingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Immunization of cattle with aParasitology · 2024
    Article
  20. Evolution of tick vaccinology.Parasitology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad Nadeem AbbasState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China.
Mohamed Amine JmelLaboratory of Genomics and Proteomics of Disease Vectors, Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Imen MekkiLaboratory of Genomics and Proteomics of Disease Vectors, Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Ingrid DijkgraafDepartment of Biochemistry, CARIM, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4586-3646
Michail KotsyfakisLaboratory of Genomics and Proteomics of Disease Vectors, Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7526-1876

Funding

Czech Science Foundation grant19-382 07247SERD Funds, project CePaVip OPVVV No. 384 CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ticks can seriously affect human and animal health around the globe, causing significant economic losses each year. Chemical acaricides are widely used to control ticks, which negatively impact the environment and result in the emergence of acaricide-resistant tick populations. A vaccine is considered as one of the best alternative approaches to control ticks and tick-borne diseases, as it is less expensive and more effective than chemical controls. Many antigen-based vaccines have been developed as a result of current advances in transcriptomics, genomics, and proteomic techniques. A few of these (e.g., Gavac

Indexed as

AcaricidesTicksVaccinesAnimalsAntigensGenomicsHumansProteomicsAcaricidesAntigensVaccinesantigen candidatesanti-tick vaccinetick controlvaccinomics

Identifiers

PMID36902400
PMCPMC10003026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read2
measurements read64
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.