ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Osteoregenerative Potential of 3D-Printed Poly
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Fluid Dynamics-Model System for Advancing Tissue Engineering and Cancer Research Studies: Biological Assessment of the Innovative BioAxFlow Dynamic Culture Bioreactor.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Potential of Composite Cements for Wound Healing in Rats.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Towards Polycaprolactone-Based Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone Tissue Engineering: A Biomimetic Approach in a 3D Printing Technique.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- In Vitro Study of Composite Cements on Mesenchymal Stem Cells of Palatal Origin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The repair of orthopedic and maxillofacial defects in modern medicine currently relies heavily on the use of autograft, allograft, void fillers, or other structural material composites. This study examines the in vitro osteo regenerative potential of polycaprolactone (PCL) tissue scaffolding, fabricated via a three-dimensional (3D) additive manufacturing technology, i.e., a pneumatic micro extrusion (PME) process. The objectives of this study were: (i) To examine the innate osteoinductive and osteoconductive potential of 3D-printed PCL tissue scaffolding and (ii) To perform a direct in vitro comparison of 3D-printed PCL scaffolding with allograft Allowash
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.