Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36901870›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Beneficial Effects of Dinitrosyl Iron Complexes on Wound Healing Compared to Commercial Nitric Oxide Plasma Generator.

Alexandra Igrunkova, Alexey Fayzullin, Natalia Serejnikova, Tatiana Lipina, Alexandr Pekshev, Anatoly Vanin, Victoria Zaborova, Elena Budanova, Dmitry Shestakov, Igor Kastyro and 1 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alexandra IgrunkovaDepartment of Human Anatomy and Histology, N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7881-2912
Alexey FayzullinDepartment of Experimental Morphology and Biobanking, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4137-8993
Natalia SerejnikovaDepartment of Experimental Morphology and Biobanking, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4097-1552
Tatiana LipinaDepartment of Cell Biology and Histology, Biological Faculty, Moscow Lomonosov State University, Moscow 119234, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3218-9568
Alexandr PekshevResearch Institute of Power Engineering, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow 105005, Russia.
Anatoly VaninSemenov Federal Research Center of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka 142432, Russia.
Victoria ZaborovaDepartment of Sports Medicine and Medical Rehabilitation, N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5044-1152
Elena BudanovaDepartment of Microbiology, Virology and Immunology Named after A.A. Vorobiev, F. Erismann Institute of Public Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1864-5635
Dmitry ShestakovMoscow Clinical Scientific Center Named after A. S. Loginov, Moscow 111123, Russia.
Igor KastyroMedical Institute, People's Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow 117198, Russia.
Anatoly ShekhterDepartment of Experimental Morphology and Biobanking, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2914-318X

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Edu-cation of the Russian Federation 075-15-2022-304Russian Science Foundation 21-75-00081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) is a gaseous molecule which plays a key role in wound healing. Previously, we identified the optimal conditions for wound healing strategies using NO donors and an air plasma generator. The aim of this study was to compare the wound healing effects of binuclear dinitrosyl iron complexes with glutathione (B-DNIC-GSH) and NO-containing gas flow (NO-CGF) at their optimal NO doses (0.04 mmol for B-DNIC-GSH and 1.0 mmol for NO-CGF per 1 cm

Indexed as

Nitric OxideNitrogen OxidesAnimalsGlutathioneIronRatsWound Healingdinitrosyl iron complexGlutathioneIronNitric OxideNitrogen Oxidesdinitrosyl iron complexes (DNIC)nitric oxidenitric oxide donorsNO-containing gas flowNO-therapyPlason devicewound healing

Identifiers

PMID36901870
PMCPMC10003304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read80
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.