Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36901793›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Unveil the Secret of the Bacteria and Phage Arms Race.

Yuer Wang, Huahao Fan, Yigang Tong

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bacterial immune systems.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Bacteriophage Therapy AgainstMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Genome synthesis, assembly, and rebooting of therapeutically useful high G+C% mycobacteriophages.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Why do bacteria accumulate antiphage defence systems?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. CombatingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuer WangCollege of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China.
Huahao FanCollege of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5007-2158
Yigang TongCollege of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China.

Funding

First-class Discipline Construction NO. XK1805, NO. XK1803-06Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities NO. BUCTRC201917, BUCTZY2022Inner Mongolia Key Research and Development Program NO. 2019ZD006National Key Research and Development Program of China NO. 2018YFA0903000, 2020YFC2005405, 2020YFA0712100, 2020YFC0840805NSFC-MFST project (China-Mongolia) NO. 31961143024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria have developed different mechanisms to defend against phages, such as preventing phages from being adsorbed on the surface of host bacteria; through the superinfection exclusion (Sie) block of phage's nucleic acid injection; by restricting modification (R-M) systems, CRISPR-Cas, aborting infection (Abi) and other defense systems to interfere with the replication of phage genes in the host; through the quorum sensing (QS) enhancement of phage's resistant effect. At the same time, phages have also evolved a variety of counter-defense strategies, such as degrading extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) that mask receptors or recognize new receptors, thereby regaining the ability to adsorb host cells; modifying its own genes to prevent the R-M systems from recognizing phage genes or evolving proteins that can inhibit the R-M complex; through the gene mutation itself, building nucleus-like compartments or evolving anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins to resist CRISPR-Cas systems; and by producing antirepressors or blocking the combination of autoinducers (AIs) and its receptors to suppress the QS. The arms race between bacteria and phages is conducive to the coevolution between bacteria and phages. This review details bacterial anti-phage strategies and anti-defense strategies of phages and will provide basic theoretical support for phage therapy while deeply understanding the interaction mechanism between bacteria and phages.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesPhage TherapyBacteriaCRISPR-Cas SystemsMutationaborting infectionbacteriaCRISPR-Cas systemsphagesquorum sensingrestricting modification systems

Identifiers

PMID36901793
PMCPMC10002423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.