Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36901743›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

A Review of Biomimetic and Biodegradable Magnetic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering and Oncology.

Gheorghe Paltanea, Veronica Manescu Paltanea, Iulian Antoniac, Aurora Antoniac, Iosif Vasile Nemoianu, Alina Robu, Horatiu Dura

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Magnetic Hydrogels as a Treatment for Oncological Pathologies.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gheorghe PaltaneaFaculty of Electrical Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3251-7146
Veronica Manescu PaltaneaFaculty of Electrical Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2535-5698
Iulian AntoniacFaculty of Material Science and Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0112-3494
Aurora AntoniacFaculty of Material Science and Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.
Iosif Vasile NemoianuFaculty of Electrical Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5610-8318
Alina RobuFaculty of Material Science and Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.
Horatiu DuraFaculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania.

Funding

Competitiveness Operational Program 2014-2020, action 1.1.3 MySMIS Code 108792, acronym project "UPB4H", contract: 250/11.05.2020Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, CNCS-UEFISCDI within PNCDI III PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2020-2591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone defects characterized by limited regenerative properties are considered a priority in surgical practice, as they are associated with reduced quality of life and high costs. In bone tissue engineering, different types of scaffolds are used. These implants represent structures with well-established properties that play an important role as delivery vectors or cellular systems for cells, growth factors, bioactive molecules, chemical compounds, and drugs. The scaffold must provide a microenvironment with increased regenerative potential at the damage site. Magnetic nanoparticles are linked to an intrinsic magnetic field, and when they are incorporated into biomimetic scaffold structures, they can sustain osteoconduction, osteoinduction, and angiogenesis. Some studies have shown that combining ferromagnetic or superparamagnetic nanoparticles and external stimuli such as an electromagnetic field or laser light can enhance osteogenesis and angiogenesis and even lead to cancer cell death. These therapies are based on

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiomimeticsBone RegenerationMagnetic PhenomenaOsteogenesisQuality of Lifebone tissue engineeringcancer therapymagnetic hyperthermiamagnetic nanoparticlesmagnetic scaffoldsphotothermal therapyregenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID36901743
PMCPMC10001544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read92
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.