Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36901669›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Effects of Cannabis Legalization on Road Safety: A Literature Review.

Francisco González-Sala, Macarena Tortosa-Pérez, María Peñaranda-Ortega, Francisco Tortosa

Full text readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francisco González-SalaDepartamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Universidad de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4124-7459
Macarena Tortosa-PérezDepartamento de Psicología, Universidad Internacional de Valencia-VIU, 46002 Valencia, Spain.
María Peñaranda-OrtegaDepartamento de Psicología Básica y Metodología, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Francisco TortosaInstituto de Investigación en Tráfico y Seguridad Vial-INTRAS, Universidad de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLegalizing medical and recreational cannabis and decriminalizing this substance may have unanticipated effects on traffic safety. The present study aimed to assess the impact of cannabis legalization on traffic accidents.

methodsA systematic review was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) declaration of the articles included in the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases. The number of papers included in the review was 29.

resultsThe results show that in 15 papers, there is a relationship between the legalization of medical and/or recreational cannabis and the number of traffic accidents, while in 5 papers, no such relationship is observed. In addition, nine articles indicate a greater number of risk behaviors related to driving after consumption, identifying young, male, and alcohol consumption together with cannabis as the risk profile.

conclusionsIt can be concluded that the legalization of medical and/or recreational cannabis has negative effects on road safety when considering the number of jobs that affect the number of fatalities.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingCannabisAccidents, TrafficAlcohol DrinkingLegislation, Drugcannabislegalizationmarijuanaroad safetysystematic reviewtraffic accidents

Identifiers

PMID36901669
PMCPMC10001957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read84
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.