ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023
How Do R&D and Renewable Energy Consumption Lead to Carbon Neutrality? Evidence from G-7 Economies.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impacts of green and non-green energies production and R&D on ecological and carbon footprints.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The discussion about whether research and development and advanced energy structure can efficiently control pollution has gained the consideration of researchers across the globe. However, there is a lack of enough empirical and theoretical evidence to support this phenomenon. To offer support of empirical evidence along with theoretical mechanism, we examine the net Impact of research and development (R&D) and renewable energy consumption (RENG) on CO2E utilizing panel data from G-7 economies for 1990-2020. Moreover, this study investigates the controlling role of economic growth and nonrenewable energy consumption (NRENG) in the R&D-CO2E models. The results obtained from the CS-ARDL panel approach verified a long-run and short-run relationship between R&D, RENG, economic growth, NRENG, and CO2E. Short- and long-run empirical results suggest that R&D and RENG improve environmental stability by decreasing CO2E, while economic growth and NRENG increase CO2E. Particularly, long-run R&D and RENG reduce CO2E with the effect of -0.091 and -0.101, respectively, while in the short run, they reduce CO2E with the effect of -0.084 and -0.094, respectively. Likewise, the 0.650% (long run) and 0.700% (short-run) increase in CO2E is due to economic growth, while the 0.138% (long run) and 0.136% (short run) upsurge in CO2E is due to an increase in NRENG. The findings obtained from the CS-ARDL model were also verified by the AMG model, while D-H non-causality approach was applied to check the pair-wise relationship among variables. The D-H causal relationship revealed that policies to focus on R&D, economic growth, and NRENG explain variation in CO2E but not vice versa. Furthermore, policies considering RENG and human capital can also affect CO2E and vice versa, meaning there is a round effect between the variables. All this indication may guide the concerned authorities to devise comprehensive policies that are helpful to environmental stability and in line with CO2E reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.