Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36901550›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Artificial Intelligence and Public Health: An Exploratory Study.

David Jungwirth, Daniela Haluza

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Digital paradigm of public health.Frontiers in public health · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. AI Horizons in Indian Healthcare: A Vision for Transformation and Equity.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. ChatGPT for digital pathology research.The Lancet. Digital health · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David JungwirthDepartment of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4834-8909
Daniela HaluzaDepartment of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5619-2863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize research by automating data analysis, generating new insights, and supporting the discovery of new knowledge. The top 10 contribution areas of AI towards public health were gathered in this exploratory study. We utilized the "text-davinci-003" model of GPT-3, using OpenAI playground default parameters. The model was trained with the largest training dataset any AI had, limited to a cut-off date in 2021. This study aimed to test the ability of GPT-3 to advance public health and to explore the feasibility of using AI as a scientific co-author. We asked the AI asked for structured input, including scientific quotations, and reviewed responses for plausibility. We found that GPT-3 was able to assemble, summarize, and generate plausible text blocks relevant for public health concerns, elucidating valuable areas of application for itself. However, most quotations were purely invented by GPT-3 and thus invalid. Our research showed that AI can contribute to public health research as a team member. According to authorship guidelines, the AI was ultimately not listed as a co-author, as it would be done with a human researcher. We conclude that good scientific practice also needs to be followed for AI contributions, and a broad scientific discourse on AI contributions is needed.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePublic HealthData AnalysisHumansKnowledgeParks, Recreationalartificial intelligenceautomationchatbotsChatGPTcollaborationdigital healthGPT-3human-AI interactionOpenAIopen sciencetechnological advancement

Identifiers

PMID36901550
PMCPMC10002031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read3
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.