Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36901458›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Subjective Well-Being in Organizations: Effects of Internal Ethical Context and Ethical Leadership.

Rita Paralta, Eduardo Simões, Ana Patrícia Duarte

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rita ParaltaInstituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal.
Eduardo SimõesCentro de Estudos sobre a Mudança Socioeconómica e o Território (DINÂMIA'CET), ISCTE-IUL, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Patrícia DuarteBusiness Research Unit (BRU-IUL), ISCTE-IUL, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7066-3956
Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia DL 57/2016/CP1359/CT0004Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB\00315\2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The literature rarely addresses the possible effects of organizations' internal ethical context on their employees' subjective well-being, that is, people's evaluation of their lives based on positive and negative emotional experiences and perceived life satisfaction. This study explored how internal ethical context's components-specifically ethics codes, ethics programs' scope and perceived relevance, and perceived corporate social responsibility practices-are related to workers' subjective well-being. Ethical leadership's possible leveraging of ethical context variables' effect on subjective well-being was also examined. The data were collected from 222 employees from various organizations in Portugal using an electronic survey. The results from multiple regression analyses indicate that organizations' internal ethical context positively affects employees' subjective well-being. This impact is mediated by ethical leadership, suggesting that leaders play a crucial role in highlighting and embodying their organization's ethical norms and orientation, thereby directly influencing their staff members' subjective well-being.

Indexed as

LeadershipSocial ResponsibilityEmotionsHumansOrganizationsSurveys and Questionnairescorporate social responsibilityethical infrastructureethical leadershipethics codesethics programsinternal ethical contextsubjective well-being

Identifiers

PMID36901458
PMCPMC10002184
OpenAlexW4322770833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read25
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.