Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36901389›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

The Predictive Accuracy of the LSI-R in Female Forensic Inpatients-Assessing the Utility of Gender-Responsive Risk Factors.

Viviane Wolf, Juliane Mayer, Ivonne Steiner, Irina Franke, Verena Klein, Judith Streb, Manuela Dudeck

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Viviane WolfDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, LVR-Clinic Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, 40629 Duesseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7935-0526
Juliane MayerDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, kbo-Isar-Amper-Clinic Taufkirchen (Vils), 84416 Taufkirchen (Vils), Germany.
Ivonne SteinerDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, kbo-Isar-Amper-Clinic Taufkirchen (Vils), 84416 Taufkirchen (Vils), Germany.
Irina FrankePsychiatric Services of Grisons, 7000 Chur, Switzerland.
Verena KleinDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, kbo-Isar-Amper-Clinic Taufkirchen (Vils), 84416 Taufkirchen (Vils), Germany.
Judith StrebDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, 89312 Guenzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0751-5835
Manuela DudeckDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, 89312 Guenzburg, Germany.
Isar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost · DEUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

Bavarian State Ministry of Families and Social Affairs ZBFS-X/1-10.700-5/3/9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female reoffending has long been a neglected research interest. Accordingly, risk assessment instruments were developed based on the criminological knowledge of male recidivism. While feminist researchers have repeatedly criticized the failure to incorporate gender-responsive risk (GR) factors, opinions on the gender neutrality of existing instruments remain inconsistent. In order to substitute the existing literature, while extending the scope to mentally disordered offenders, the aim of the given study was the prediction of general recidivism in a sample of 525 female forensic inpatients who had been discharged from forensic psychiatric care in Germany between 2001 and 2018. Primarily, ROC analysis was conducted to assess the predictive accuracy of the LSI-R. Subsequently, separate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the predictive utility of GR factors on recidivism. Lastly, multiple binary logistic regression was used to assess the incremental validity of the GR factors. The results showed that the GR factors (i.e., intimate relationship dysfunction, mental health issues, parental stress, adult physical abuse, and poverty) significantly contributed to the prediction of recidivism, while a mixed personality disorder, a dissocial personality, an unsupportive partner, and poverty added incremental validity to the predictive accuracy of the LSI-R. However, given that the added variables could only improve classification accuracy by 2.2%, the inclusion of gender-specific factors should be cautiously evaluated.

Indexed as

CrimeInpatientsAdultFemaleHumansMaleRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsViolencefemale offendersgendermental illnessrecidivismrisk assessmentrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID36901389
PMCPMC10001617
OpenAlexW4322742678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read43
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.