Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36901362›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

An Agenda-Setting Account for Psychological Typhoon Eye Effect on Responses to the Outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan.

Shu-Wen Yang, Ming-Xing Xu, Yi Kuang, Yang Ding, Yu-Xin Lin, Fei Wang, Li-Lin Rao, Rui Zheng, Shu Li

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shu-Wen YangCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Ming-Xing XuCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Yi KuangDepartment of Psychology, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China.
Yang DingCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Yu-Xin LinDepartment of Management and Organizations, Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Fei WangSchool of Journalism and Communication, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
Li-Lin RaoCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Rui ZhengCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Shu LiDepartment of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4402-1674

Funding

Key Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences KFJ-FP-201906Key Projects of National Social Science Foundation of China 16AZD058Major Projects of National Social Science Foundation of China 17ZDA325Major Projects of National Social Science Foundation of China 18ZDA332MOE (Ministry of Education of China) Youth Foundation Project of Humanities and Social Sciences 19YJC630194National Natural Science Foundation of China 71761167001the Major Projects of National Social Science Foundation of China 19ZDA358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan in 2020, we conducted a nationwide survey of 8170 respondents from 31 provinces/municipalities in China via Sojump to examine the relationship between the distance to respondents' city of residence from Wuhan and their safety concerns and risk perception of the epidemic that occurred in Wuhan City. We found that (1) the farther (psychologically or physically) people were from Wuhan, the more concerned they were with the safety of the epidemic risk in Wuhan, which we dubbed the psychological typhoon eye (PTE) effect on responses to the outbreak of COVID-19; (2) agenda setting can provide a principled account for such effect: the risk information proportion mediated the PTE effect. The theoretical and managerial implications for the PTE effect and public opinion disposal were discussed, and agenda setting was identified to be responsible for the preventable overestimated risk perception.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cyclonic StormsEpidemicsChinaCitiesDisease OutbreaksHumansagenda settingpsychological typhoon eye effectrisk information proportionrisk perception

Identifiers

PMID36901362
PMCPMC10001814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read2
measurements read14
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.