Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36901293›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Implementation of an Environmental Cleaning Protocol in Hospital Critical Areas Using a UV-C Disinfection Robot.

Beatrice Casini, Benedetta Tuvo, Michela Scarpaci, Michele Totaro, Federica Badalucco, Silvia Briani, Grazia Luchini, Anna Laura Costa, Angelo Baggiani

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hospital cleaning: past, present, and future.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Beatrice CasiniDepartment of Translational Research and the New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3609-4419
Benedetta TuvoDepartment of Translational Research and the New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6562-0321
Michela ScarpaciDepartment of Translational Research and the New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Michele TotaroDepartment of Translational Research and the New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Federica BadaluccoDepartment of Translational Research and the New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Silvia BrianiHospital Management, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Grazia LuchiniHospital Management, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Anna Laura CostaDepartment of Translational Research and the New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Angelo BaggianiDepartment of Translational Research and the New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving the cleaning and disinfection of high-touch surfaces is one of the core components of reducing healthcare-associated infections. The effectiveness of an enhanced protocol applying UV-C irradiation for terminal room disinfection between two successive patients was evaluated. Twenty high-touch surfaces in different critical areas were sampled according to ISO 14698-1, both immediately pre- and post-cleaning and disinfection standard operating protocol (SOP) and after UV-C disinfection (160 sampling sites in each condition, 480 in total). Dosimeters were applied at the sites to assess the dose emitted. A total of 64.3% (103/160) of the sampling sites tested after SOP were positive, whereas only 17.5% (28/160) were positive after UV-C. According to the national hygienic standards for health-care setting, 9.3% (15/160) resulted in being non-compliant after SOP and only 1.2% (2/160) were non-compliant after UV-C disinfection. Operation theaters was the setting that resulted in being less compliant with the standard limit (≤15 colony-forming unit/24 cm

Indexed as

Cross InfectionRoboticsDisinfectionHospitalsHumansUltraviolet RaysXenonXenonhigh-touch surfaceshospital environmental cleaning and disinfectionultraviolet C light-emitting device

Identifiers

PMID36901293
PMCPMC10001687
OpenAlexW4322629494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read22
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.