Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36901233›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

A Cluster-Randomised Stepped-Wedge Impact Evaluation of a Pragmatic Implementation Process for Improving the Cultural Responsiveness of Non-Aboriginal Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Services: A Pilot Study.

Sara Farnbach, Alexandra Henderson, Julaine Allan, Raechel Wallace, Anthony Shakeshaft

Full text readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara FarnbachNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7013-1079
Alexandra HendersonNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5471-8219
Julaine AllanRural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9299-5866
Raechel WallaceNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Anthony ShakeshaftNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5472-0930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited evidence regarding implementing organisational improvements in the cultural responsiveness of non-Aboriginal services. Using a pragmatic implementation process to promote organisational change around cultural responsiveness, we aimed to (i) identify its impact on the cultural responsiveness of participating services; (ii) identify areas with the most improvement; and (iii) present a program logic to guide cultural responsiveness. A best-evidence guideline for culturally responsive service delivery in non-Aboriginal Alcohol and other Drug (AoD) treatment services was co-designed. Services were grouped geographically and randomised to start dates using a stepped wedge design, then baseline audits were completed (operationalization of the guideline). After receiving feedback, the services attended guideline implementation workshops and selected three key action areas; they then completed follow-up audits. A two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) test was used to analyse differences between baseline and follow-up audits on three key action areas and all other action areas. Improvements occurred across guideline themes, with significant increases between median baseline and follow-up audit scores on three key action areas (median increase = 2.0; Interquartile Range (IQR) = 1.0-3.0) and all other action areas (median increase = 7.5; IQR = 5.0-11.0). All services completing the implementation process had increased audit scores, reflecting improved cultural responsiveness. The implementation process appeared to be feasible for improving culturally responsive practice in AoD services and may be applicable elsewhere.

Indexed as

AlcoholismCultural CompetencySubstance-Related DisordersAustraliaHealth Services, IndigenousHumansPilot ProjectsAboriginal and Torres Strait Islanderalcohol and other drugsauditco-designcultural responsivenessimplementationservice delivery

Identifiers

PMID36901233
PMCPMC10001979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read9
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.