Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36901227›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

The Effectiveness of Electrical Vestibular Stimulation (VeNS) on Symptoms of Anxiety: Study Protocol of a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Trial.

Teris Cheung, Joyce Yuen Ting Lam, Kwan Hin Fong, Yuen Shan Ho, Alex Ho, Calvin Pak-Wing Cheng, Julie Sittlington, Yu-Tao Xiang, Tim Man Ho Li

Open access · goldFull text readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Teris CheungSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5878-9193
Joyce Yuen Ting LamSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6445-6240
Kwan Hin FongSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yuen Shan HoSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Alex HoIntegrated Services for Persons with Disabilities, Christian Family Service Centre, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Calvin Pak-Wing ChengDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4457-1908
Julie SittlingtonSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8195-8752
Yu-Tao XiangDepartment of Public Health and Medicinal Administration, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macau SAR, China.
Tim Man Ho LiDepartment of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Hong Kong Polytechnic University · HKChinese University of Hong Kong · HKChristian Family Service Centre · CNUniversity of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of Macau · MOUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of symptoms of anxiety is increasing, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. A home use transdermal neurostimulation device might help to minimize the severity of anxiety disorder. To the best of our knowledge, there is no clinical trial using transdermal neurostimulation to treat individuals with symptoms of anxiety in Asia. This gives us the impetus to execute the first study which aims at evaluating the efficacy of Electrical Vestibular Stimulation (VeNS) on anxiety in Hong Kong. This study proposes a two-armed, double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial including the active VeNS and sham VeNS group. Both groups will be measured at baseline (T1), immediately after the intervention (T2), and at the 1-month (T3) and 3-month follow-up (T4). A total of 66 community-dwelling adults aged 18 to 60 with anxiety symptoms will be recruited in this study. All subjects will be computer randomised into either the active VeNS group or the sham VeNS group in a 1:1 ratio. All subjects in each group will receive twenty 30 min VeNS sessions during weekdays, which will be completed in a 4-week period. Baseline measurements and post-VeNS evaluation of the psychological outcomes (i.e., anxiety, insomnia, and quality of life) will also be conducted on all participants. The 1-month and 3-month follow-up period will be used to assess the long-term sustainability of the VeNS intervention. For statistical analysis, ANOVA with repeated measures will be used to analyze data. Missing data were managed with multiple mutations. The level of significance will be set to

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAnxietyAnxiety DisordersHong KongHumansPandemicsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2Treatment Outcomeanxietyefficacynon-invasive brain stimulationrctvestibular stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36901227
PMCPMC10002296
OpenAlexW4322501595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read23
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.