ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023
Finite Elements Analysis of Tooth-A Comparative Analysis of Multiple Failure Criteria.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of radial clearance on Tresca stress in AlScientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of stress distribution in maxillary premolar restored with onlay fabricated with different restorative materials - A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Finite element analysis of occlusal stress in cervical dentin: effects of thickness and cross-section.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- The Influence of the Periodontal Breakdown over the Amount of Orthodontic Force Reaching the Dental Pulp and NVB During Orthodontic Movements-A Biomechanical Finite Element Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of Molar Distalization with Clear Aligners on Periodontal Ligament Stress and Root Resorption Risk: A Systematic Review of 3D Finite Element Analysis Studies.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Summed Tissue Resistance of Periodontal Ligaments and Alveolar Bone in Orthodontic Distal Retraction of Maxillary Canines: Mathematical Simulation of Clinical Data and Interpretation of Results.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- The Amount of Orthodontic Force Reaching the Dental Pulp and Neuro-Vascular Bundle During Orthodontic Movements in the Intact Periodontium.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Article
- Functional Load Capacity of Teeth with Reduced Periodontal Support: A Finite Element Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effects of Increasing the Orthodontic Forces over Cortical and Trabecular Bone during Periodontal Breakdown-A Finite Elements Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Orthodontic Internal Resorption Assessment in Periodontal Breakdown-A Finite Elements Analysis (Part II).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Cortical and Trabecular Bone Stress Assessment during Periodontal Breakdown-A Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Multiple Failure Criteria.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Assessment of the Orthodontic External Resorption in Periodontal Breakdown-A Finite Elements Analysis (Part I).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Herein Finite elements analysis (FEA) study assesses the adequacy and accuracy of five failure criteria (Von Mises (VM), Tresca, maximum principal (S1), minimum principal (S3), and Hydrostatic pressure) for the study of tooth as a structure (made of enamel, dentin, and cement), along with its stress absorption-dissipation ability. Eighty-one 3D models of the second lower premolar (with intact and 1-8 mm reduced periodontium) were subjected to five orthodontic forces (intrusion, extrusion, tipping, rotation, and translation) of 0.5 N (approx. 50 gf) (in a total of 405 FEA simulations). Only the Tresca and VM criteria showed biomechanically correct stress display during the 0-8 mm periodontal breakdown simulation, while the other three showed various unusual biomechanical stress display. All five failure criteria displayed comparable quantitative stress results (with Tresca and VM producing the highest of all), showing the rotational and translational movements to produce the highest amount of stress, while intrusion and extrusion, the lowest. The tooth structure absorbed and dissipated most of the stress produced by the orthodontic loads (from a total of 0.5 N/50 gf only 0.125 N/12.5 gf reached PDL and 0.01 N/1 gf the pulp and NVB). The Tresca criterion seems to be more accurate than Von Mises for the study of tooth as structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.