Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36901017›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Collaboration for Developing and Sustaining Community Dementia-Friendly Initiatives: A Realist Evaluation.

Marjolein Thijssen, Maud J L Graff, Monique A S Lexis, Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Kate Radford, Pip A Logan, Ramon Daniels, Wietske Kuijer-Siebelink

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marjolein ThijssenRadboud University Medical Center, Radboudumc Research Institute, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6541-523X
Maud J L GraffRadboud University Medical Center, Radboudumc Research Institute, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Monique A S LexisResearch Centre Assistive Technology in Care, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, 6419 DJ Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Maria W G Nijhuis-van der SandenRadboud University Medical Center, Radboudumc Research Institute, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2637-6877
Kate RadfordCentre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6246-3180
Pip A LoganCentre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6657-2381
Ramon DanielsResearch Centre Assistive Technology in Care, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, 6419 DJ Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Wietske Kuijer-SiebelinkSchool of Education, HAN University of Applied Sciences, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7009-3378
HAN University of Applied Sciences · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Nottingham · GBZuyd University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia-friendly communities (DFCs) are seen as key to the inclusion and participation of people with dementia and carers. Dementia-friendly initiatives (DFIs) are important building blocks for the growth of DFCs. The collaboration between different stakeholders is a central aspect in developing and sustaining DFIs.

aimThis study tests and refines an initial theory about collaborating for DFIs with special attention for the involvement of people with dementia and their carers during the collaboration for DFIs. The realist approach is used for deepening contextual aspects, mechanisms, outcomes, and its explanatory power.

methodsA participatory case study design using qualitative data (focus groups, observations, reflections, minutes from meetings, and exit interviews) was executed in four Dutch municipalities that have ambitions to become dementia- friendly communities.

resultsThe refined theory on the collaboration for DFIs incorporates contextual aspects such as diversity, shared insights, and clarity. It draws attention to the importance of mechanisms such as the recognition of efforts and progress, informal distributed leadership, interdependency, belonging, significance, and commitment. These mechanisms resonate with feeling useful and feeling collectively powerful in the collaboration. The outcomes of collaboration were activation, getting new ideas, and fun. Our findings address how stakeholders' routines and perspectives impact the involvement of people with dementia and their carers during collaboration.

conclusionThis study provides detailed information about collaboration for DFIs. The collaboration for DFIs is largely influenced by feeling useful and collectively powerful. Further research is needed to understand how these mechanisms can be triggered with the involvement of people with dementia and their carers in the heart of the collaboration.

Indexed as

DementiaCaregiversEmotionsFocus GroupsHumansResearch Designcollaborationdementia-friendlyinclusioninequitypatient and public involvementrealist evaluationsocial participation

Identifiers

PMID36901017
PMCPMC10001691
OpenAlexW4321788268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.