ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023
The Opinion of Polish Coeliac Patients on the Knowledge of Medical Professionals and Support Groups about Coeliac Disease-A Pilot Study.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Availability and Purchasing of Gluten-Free Cereal Products in a Polish Population of Female Celiac Disease Patients.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A high quality of knowledge and how it is communicated by healthcare professionals (HCPs) let the patient understand coeliac disease (CD) and result in better adherence to therapeutic recommendations. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to assess the opinion of Polish respondents with CD on the comprehension of CD among Polish HCPs. The analysis was based on 796 responses from patients (the members of the Polish Coeliac Society) with confirmed CD diagnosis (224; 28.1% children and 572; 71.9% adults). The most frequently consulted HCPs regarding CD symptoms in the analysed group were gastroenterologists, and various support groups and associations for CD patients. Furthermore, their comprehension of CD was rated best, as 89.3% (n = 552) of the patients who had contact with support groups and associations classified their knowledge on CD as good. More than a half of the respondents (n = 310, 56.6%) who had contact with general practitioners (GPs) due to their symptoms, rated the doctor's knowledge on CD as bad. Nurses' comprehension on CD was classified as bad by 45 (52.3%) respondents who had contact with a nurse. Out of 294 Polish patients with CD who had contact with a dietician, 247 (84.0%) assessed that the dietician communicated their knowledge on CD well. The respondents rated that GPs and nurses communicated their knowledge on CD in the worst manner (60.4% and 58.1%, respectively). Out of 796 respondents, 792 (99.5%) provided information about the number of appointments with GPs due to symptoms that occurred prior to CD diagnosis. The respondents had contact with GPs 13 863 times before obtaining a CD diagnosis due to their symptoms. After the establishment of a CD diagnosis, the number of appointments with GPs decreased to 3850, and the average number of appointments decreased from 17.8 to 5.1. The respondents assessed that the knowledge on CD of HCPs is not satisfactory. The work of support groups and associations on CD, who promote reliable CD diagnosis and treatment methods, should be promoted. The cooperation between various HCPs needs to be encouraged, which may lead to better compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.