Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36900902›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Classification of Elementary Oral Lesions from Clinical Images.

Rita Fabiane Teixeira Gomes, Jean Schmith, Rodrigo Marques de Figueiredo, Samuel Armbrust Freitas, Giovanna Nunes Machado, Juliana Romanini, Vinicius Coelho Carrard

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Performance of AI Chatbots in Preliminary Diagnosis of Maxillofacial Pathologies.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rita Fabiane Teixeira GomesDepartment of Oral Pathology, Faculdade de Odontologia, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90035-003, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6196-1217
Jean SchmithPolytechnic School, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos-UNISINOS, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil.
Rodrigo Marques de FigueiredoPolytechnic School, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos-UNISINOS, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3496-5575
Samuel Armbrust FreitasDepartment of Applied Computing, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos-UNISINOS, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7055-5883
Giovanna Nunes MachadoPolytechnic School, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos-UNISINOS, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil.
Juliana RomaniniOral Medicine, Otorhynolaringology Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre 90035-003, Brazil.
Vinicius Coelho CarrardDepartment of Oral Pathology, Faculdade de Odontologia, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90035-003, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1624-0178
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesArtificial intelligence has generated a significant impact in the health field. The aim of this study was to perform the training and validation of a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based model to automatically classify six clinical representation categories of oral lesion images.

methodThe CNN model was developed with the objective of automatically classifying the images into six categories of elementary lesions: (1) papule/nodule; (2) macule/spot; (3) vesicle/bullous; (4) erosion; (5) ulcer and (6) plaque. We selected four architectures and using our dataset we decided to test the following architectures: ResNet-50, VGG16, InceptionV3 and Xception. We used the confusion matrix as the main metric for the CNN evaluation and discussion.

resultsA total of 5069 images of oral mucosa lesions were used. The oral elementary lesions classification reached the best result using an architecture based on InceptionV3. After hyperparameter optimization, we reached more than 71% correct predictions in all six lesion classes. The classification achieved an average accuracy of 95.09% in our dataset.

conclusionsWe reported the development of an artificial intelligence model for the automated classification of elementary lesions from oral clinical images, achieving satisfactory performance. Future directions include the study of including trained layers to establish patterns of characteristics that determine benign, potentially malignant and malignant lesions.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeural Networks, Computerautomated classificationcomputer vision systemsoral canceroral mucosa lesions

Identifiers

PMID36900902
PMCPMC10002140
OpenAlexW4321496476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read22
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.